Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a social mental illness

[Deezer Shoove]

...This TCS [Trump Cacksucking Syndrome] sufferer can't get it through his thick skull that for every 100 TCS suffering trump voters there is about 102 people who strongly despise he whose cack he sucks... word...   

..you TCS sufferers just need to get out a little more...fresh air, sunshine, pleasant thoughts, etc., alleviate TCS...

You need a remedial reading class.

You lap up **** about a dollar and cannot regurgitate those details back coherently.
Yet, you accept all the anomalies in an election simply because you agree with the results.

That second part is exactly what you HATE about people playing the "dollar game" and smiling.

Go **** yourself, hypocrite.

[Blackvegetable]

Why should a dimwitted maggot with a major emotional issue because of Trump be the judge of that?

Show me what I've got wrong..


 

[Blackvegetable]

You need a remedial reading class.

You lap up **** about a dollar and cannot regurgitate those details back coherently.
Yet, you accept all the anomalies in an election simply because you agree with the results.

That second part is exactly what you HATE about people playing the "dollar game" and smiling.

Go **** yourself, hypocrite.

Yet, you accept all the anomalies in an election simply because you agree with the results.

Dead End Loser...

https://youtu.be/RZeoSrp2sj4

[Deezer Shoove]

Dead End Loser...

https://youtu.be/RZeoSrp2sj4

You have nothing to say.
My opinion is quite clearly uncomplicated by the pretzel logic you "whatisawoman? people" employ every day.

Even with all this transparent face-saving **** (the can't beat 'em, join 'em ****), you still can't admit the other side has reason for its skepticism.


Hypocrites.

[Blackvegetable]

You have nothing to say.
My opinion is quite clearly uncomplicated by the pretzel logic you "whatisawoman? people" employ every day.

Even with all this transparent face-saving **** (the can't beat 'em, join 'em ****), you still can't admit the other side has reason for its skepticism.

Hypocrites.

You don't. 

Dead End Loser 
 

[peepee]

You lap up **** about a dollar and cannot regurgitate those details back coherently.
Yet, you accept all the anomalies in an election simply because you agree with the results.

     

...i don't agree with ((((ANY)))) republicrat '$election results', you lame puppet trump cacksucker [and monetary ignoramus] ...the $election$ you retardedly legitimize are a fraud, lame puppet trump cacksucker [and monetary ignoramus] 

...btw, nobody ever has [or probably ever will] presented any 'dollar details' to you 'coherently'...'coherent thinking' about the mo$t important thing$ is not a strong suit among you republican-radio-level dummies.... don't blame me for your monetary ignorance [or trump cacksucking]...   

[Deezer Shoove]

You don't. 

Dead End Loser

I have no idea what that means.
...so it matches most of what you post.
Meaningless drivel is not a good substitute for your constant, REALLY stupid, **** questions.

Go back to your Word-A-Day, Willy Nurser.

[Blackvegetable]

I have no idea what that means.
...so it matches most of what you post.
Meaningless drivel is not a good substitute for your constant, REALLY stupid, **** questions.

Go back to your Word-A-Day, Willy Nurser.

It means your effort to substitute "the other side" for "I" was laughed off.

 

[Deezer Shoove]

     

...i don't agree with ((((ANY)))) republicrat '$election results', you lame puppet trump cacksucker [and monetary ignoramus] ...the $election$ you retardedly legitimize are a fraud, lame puppet trump cacksucker [and monetary ignoramus] 

...btw, nobody ever has [or probably ever will] presented any 'dollar details' to you 'coherently'...'coherent thinking' about the mo$t important thing$ is not a strong suit among you republican-radio-level dummies.... don't blame me for your monetary ignorance [or trump cacksucking]... 

Dearest Libtard Protector,
I warmly suggest you cycle some of your tiresome inanities. This is meant to be instructive to aid you in garnering interest and enthusiasm among your vast, but shrinking, readership.
Just so you know: Trump isn't president. You should begin to criticize Biden someday.
Sincerely,
DS

ps I was kidding about "vast" but serious about "shrinking" readership.  

[Deezer Shoove]

It means your effort to substitute "the other side" for "I" was laughed off.

Please explain "effort".

btw
You do not laugh. Humorless people are not capable of inducing or producing that.

[peepee]

Dearest Libtard protector.....Just so you know: Trump isn't president. You should begin to criticize Biden someday.
Sincerely,
DS

...'libtard'        ...reality check for PTC: ..as to the mo$t important thing$ there is not one thin dimes difference between the 'libtards' and you 'conservatard' PTC'S...[and monetary ignoramuses] ...word....   
 

[ScottMon]

GREAT ARTICLA FROM MSN
Arizona women to be sentenced in 2020 ballot harvesting scheme (msn.com)



OH, HAVE A NICE DAY ****-FOR-BRAINS

4 votes?  Just 4 votes? 
 

[ScottMon]

Which is more likely:

A steal with a coverup so clean that most of the physical evidence is gone?
-or-
Over half the voters breaking records for Joe "Closet Case" Biden?

Hint:
The Steal would require far less people than 81million co-conspirators.

Keep in mind that Trump has the 2nd most votes in history.  You can't disclaim one for breaking a record without disclaiming the other for breaking a similar record.
 

[nefarious101]

Progressive Idiocrats see TDS as being the single most important part of good governance


https://www.americanthinker.com/article ... ning_.html

[TB7]

4 votes?  Just 4 votes? 

FROM YOU
No word on those that never accepted the 2020 election results?  Folks claiming fraud but can't prove it?

DID I PROVE FRAUD   IS HARVEST BALLOTING FRAUD  

[ScottMon]

FROM YOU
No word on those that never accepted the 2020 election results?  Folks claiming fraud but can't prove it?

DID I PROVE FRAUD :  IS HARVEST BALLOTING FRAUD :

Ok, No proof of massive voter fraud.  I left out the word Massive.  Mea Culpa.  

[TB7]

Ok, No proof of massive voter fraud.  I left out the word Massive.  Mea Culpa.

the massive voter fraud will be proven when the GOP takes control of the house in Nov...GUARANTEED
 

[nuckin futz]

NO QUESTIONS ****

 

[ScottMon]

the massive voter fraud will be proven when the GOP takes control of the house in Nov...GUARANTEED

The GOP has had control 2020.  They held authority over the elections in states like Georgia.  Trump's own man stated it was the most secure election in history.  Trump had no proof of massive fraud but stated he did, over and over.   He wasn't man enough to concede to the election.  
 

[nuckin futz]

FROM YOU
No word on those that never accepted the 2020 election results?  Folks claiming fraud but can't prove it?

DID I PROVE FRAUD :  IS HARVEST BALLOTING FRAUD :