Why "the Dumbest **** Alive?Huey » 05 Aug 2022, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ First time initial jobless claims are up. Have been for months.
Immediately qualified by...First time initial jobless claims are up.
#readhissigHave been for months
Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2022, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑Why "the Dumbest **** Alive?Huey » 05 Aug 2022, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ First time initial jobless claims are up. Have been for months.
Watch...
Immediately qualified by...First time initial jobless claims are up.#readhissigHave been for months
If they've been going up for months how can this be "the first time"?Huey » 05 Aug 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ I gave you the information early on another thread. They have been going up for months. And to avoid discussing it you go into a Meltdown Mary spittle filled rant.
Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑If they've been going up for months how can this be "the first time"?Huey » 05 Aug 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ I gave you the information early on another thread. They have been going up for months. And to avoid discussing it you go into a Meltdown Mary spittle filled rant.
Are these your words?Huey » 05 Aug 2022, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
Who is really the stupid ****.
Who said it was the first time? Please tell me you aren't being serious.
First time initial jobless claims are up.
Have been for months.
Was their headline a lie, or did BLS report a 62.1% civilian labor force participation rate?Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2022, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that job growth was widespread, led by gains in leisure and hospitality, professional and business services, and health care. "Both total nonfarm employment and the unemployment rate have returned to their February 2020 pre-pandemic levels," BLS noted.
https://www.cnsnews.com/article/nationa ... icans-drop
Now the actual number exceeded the estimates by more than 100%....
Does anyone want to guess what the CNS headline is?
61.1%: Labor Force Participation Falls in July, As 239,000 More Americans Drop Out of Labor Force
Don't ever wonder why you're morans, Morans.
Cheddy, please.Cedar » 05 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Was their headline a lie, or did BLS report a 62.1% civilian labor force participation rate?
I can't help but notice you failed to answer,
Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2022, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑Are these your words?Huey » 05 Aug 2022, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
Who is really the stupid ****.
Who said it was the first time? Please tell me you aren't being serious.First time initial jobless claims are up.Have been for months.
Probably why the series is Initial Claims.Huey » 05 Aug 2022, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Yup, you really are serious.
First time Jobless claims as in INITIAL JOBLESS claims. Not the first time they are going up in months.
Get that psychiatric help I told you about.
Huey » 05 Aug 2022, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Yup, you really are serious.
First time Jobless claims as in INITIAL JOBLESS claims. Not the first time they are going up in months.
Get that psychiatric help I told you about.
First time initial jobless claims
How is unemployment calculated, rube?Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2022, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that job growth was widespread, led by gains in leisure and hospitality, professional and business services, and health care. "Both total nonfarm employment and the unemployment rate have returned to their February 2020 pre-pandemic levels," BLS noted.
https://www.cnsnews.com/article/nationa ... icans-drop
Now the actual number exceeded the estimates by more than 100%....
Does anyone want to guess what the CNS headline is?
61.1%: Labor Force Participation Falls in July, As 239,000 More Americans Drop Out of Labor Force
Don't ever wonder why you're morans, Morans.
The same way it was in Feb 2020.
So it depends on workforce participation, right?
Are you referring to the Labor Force Participation Rate?Independent » 06 Aug 2022, 1:23 am » wrote: ↑ So it depends on workforce participation, right?
Go ahead. We all know.
You’re a **** Moran!
Its not calculated like it USED to be.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2022, 5:29 am » wrote: ↑ Are you referring to the Labor Force Participation Rate?
Stop right there.sootedupCyndi » 06 Aug 2022, 5:38 am » wrote: ↑ Its not calculated like it USED to be.I actually heard.. They call people on the phone and ask.. Are you working?
depends on where they call I guess.
Seriously i heard that. The unemployment rate is a pet peeve of mine.
Are you dodging?Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2022, 5:29 am » wrote: ↑ Are you referring to the Labor Force Participation Rate?
Answer the **** question. You idiots aren't very good with terminology.
Users browsing this forum: Annoyed Liberall, Bernardeyr, Bill Gates [Bot], Buffalo, Cannonpointer, ConsRule, Deezer Shoove, dickens, Famagusta, FOS, freeman, GHETTO BLASTER, Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Ike Bana, Independent, Jinn Martini, Kobia2, Monderegal, nefarious101, NEILCAR, Neo, neue regel, PaperLi [Bot], Pinterest [Bot], PoliticalPopUp, roadkill, ScottMon, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], Taipan, thelion, Twitter [Bot], walkingstick, Wayback Machine [Bot], Xavier_Onassis, Yandex [Bot] and 175 guests