You truly are an IGNORANT POS.IkeBana » 23 Jan 2023, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ The First Amendment has nothing to do with Musk's whining and sniveling about censorship on internet social media platforms, you stupid **** polack. The only thing the First Amendment protects us from is infringement of free expression by the government, which is not what happened to Musk, Trump, or anybody else on Twitter... you stupid **** polack.
Xavier_Onassis » 23 Jan 2023, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ How can you judge anything you never watch?
Football games consist of equal parts of large men playing football, commercials and useless remarks by commentators. It that is what turns you on, then one can easily assume that you are a very, very shallow person.
And that "roadkill" is an apt name.
Just speed on by and try to avoid the stench of rotting flesh.
Mr.7 » 09 Dec 2022, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑ It’s amazing that Elon Musk, a first generation immigrant to America who is doing more to uphold American values, the First Amendment and our right to Free Speech than anybody we've ever seen. It's remarkable what he has done so far. I hope he'll have the courage to continue and let it all out there. People deserve to know what was going on out there. And the challenge comes to Facebook and Google to match that kind of openness because frankly, they’ve been at least as bad and in someways Google has been worse than Twitter.
If Elon was a citizen of another country and living there, that country would name cities and schools after him. Not the U.S. though. The culture is broken. External enemies of this nation know this and are exploiting this.
Elon paid $45,000,000,000 to restore free speech to our Country. History will remember.
Twitter Files Part 3 reveals what led to Trump's removal from social media platform | Fox News
Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2023, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑![]()
You're a moron.
Elon is choking on Twitter.
I predict there will be a fire sale.
Mr.7 » 23 Jan 2023, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ You truly are an IGNORANT POS.
In general, the First Amendment guarantees the right to express ideas and information. On a basic level, it means that people can express an opinion (even an unpopular or unsavory one) without fear of government censorship. It protects all forms of communication, from speeches to art and other media.
Freedom of Speech - Origins, First Amendment & Limits - HISTORY
You people are so **** stupid.without fear of government censorship
LINK, desperately hedging and reframing dick sucker?jack » 23 Jan 2023, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ I thought you were smarter than that. "Even if you grant" the edit? You cut off everything after "value". As explained the first time, it is the freedom to speak that has value, even if the speech itself has none.
From what language, dick sucker?jack » 23 Jan 2023, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑The liberal animus involving the Second Amendment is focused on the amendment's interpretation
Actually I am 100% correct. You think the First Amendment applies to speech on a private business social networking website? Really? Try reading the Constitution some time...specifically the Bill of Rights...right there is the First Amendment that prohibits government infringement of the right to free expression. Are we surprised you're a **** stupid polack ignoramus when it comes to the Constitution of the United States? No, we are not.
It doesn't say Twitter shall make no law or abridge the freedom of speech...it says Congress shall make no law. Can **** Justin Beiber be this **** stupid and ignorant? Of course.Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Stopping the censorship is suppressing free speech, he tells ya!Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2023, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑![]()
You're a moron.
Elon is choking on Twitter.
I predict there will be a fire sale.
IkeBana » 23 Jan 2023, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ Actually I am 100% correct. You think the First Amendment applies to speech on a private business social networking website? Really? Try reading the Constitution some time...specifically the Bill of Rights...right there is the First Amendment that prohibits government infringement of the right to free expression. Are we surprised you're a **** stupid polack ignoramus when it comes to the Constitution of the United States? No, we are not.
It doesn't say Twitter shall make no law or abridge the freedom of speech...it says Congress shall make no law. Can **** Justin Beiber be this **** stupid and ignorant? Of course.
Come on CP...set these stupid **** polacks straight, will ya?
Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ Stopping the censorship is suppressing free speech, he tells ya!
But then, this piece of **** has argued persistently for the right of men to invade his daughter's shower and sports.
He is utterly and irredeemably cucked.
get the paper bag...Stopping the censorship is suppressing free speech,
You're always wrong.
Says the weak sister who is giving her opinion as to how twitter should be run, while hyperventilating about its imminent demise.Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2023, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ get the paper bag...
Breathe into it until your hysteria passes.
I haven't said **** about "how Twitter should be run"...Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2023, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ Says the weak sister who is giving her opinion as to how twitter should be run, while hyperventilating about its imminent demise.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You hyperventilated, because free speech offends you, little hitler.Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2023, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ I haven't said **** about "how Twitter should be run"...
I said Elon is **** up, and I predict he will sell it, at a considerable discount, before it takes down all his other "interests".
No....Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2023, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ You hyperventilated, because free speech offends you, little hitler.
Now, find a man, ask for a slap, and get ahold of yourself, Fluffy.
In the retelling, fruit fly.Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2023, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ No....
I gobsmacked you for being a hysterical twat.
You understand themes, plots, ssdd all evolving from one universal constant regardless point in history being debated for current events setting goals for tomorrow/next generation's outcomes before great great grandchildren even become parents, or grandparents, or great grandparents as their previous generations evolved into so far?Xavier_Onassis » 23 Jan 2023, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ How can you judge anything you never watch?
Football games consist of equal parts of large men playing football, commercials and useless remarks by commentators. It that is what turns you on, then one can easily assume that you are a very, very shallow person.
And that "roadkill" is an apt name.
Just speed on by and try to avoid the stench of rotting flesh.
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Bob, Buck Naked, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Chiseler151, ConsRule, DeplorablePatriot, EDC4ALL!, FJB, FOS, Goodgrief, Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hotblack Desiato, Ike Bana, Jantje_Smit, jerra b, Kobia2, maineman, Majik, Makallbuks, Mirabeau, Monderegal, Mrkelly, murdock, NEILCAR, neue regel, Nostradamus' omh, PaperLi [Bot], Pastor Blast, PhiloBeddo, RebelGator, Redheaded Stranger, roadkill, ROG62, ScottMon, SJConspirator, Skans, slideman, sooted up Cyndi, SouthernFried, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], sunburn, Taipan, Vegas, walkingstick, Warcok, WindyCocoa, Xavier_Onassis, Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest