No, just showers with young biden daughter Ashley and other under aged little girls. Dr Jill probably gave up sex with the perverted **** years ago.
It's not about "improper handling"..Huey » 13 Jan 2023, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ That's nice. Not relevant to THE ISSUE of improper handling of classified materials. Just like Biden.
These are my words from earlier:Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ It's not about "improper handling"..
But you'd need to read, rather than rely on someone at FOX to tell you...
Tiny,Huey » 13 Jan 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ These are my words from earlier:
The issue is that neither properly handled and secured classified documents by taking them out of the WH. BOTH of them did it.
Now pay attention to this:18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
(b)
For purposes of this section, the provision of documents and materials to the Congress shall not constitute an offense under subsection (a).
(c)
In this section, the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text ... 0Institute
Type this into Google and you will see the above is the first hit.
"Penalty for mishandling classified information"
Shove you semantics up your ***.
Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
Your words are irrelevant.
The facts matter.
Justice didn't seek a search warrant upon learning that the docs were at Mar a Lago.
They did so after Grifty LIED about having surrendered all of them.
So the issue is CLEARLY NOT the "mishandling".
makes you wander why plugs had to ax her to marry him multiple times before she said yesBuffalo » 13 Jan 2023, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ No, just showers with young biden daughter Ashley and other under aged little girls. Dr Jill probably gave up sex with the perverted **** years ago.
How did the FBI and/or DOJ even know that Trump had anymore documents? Documents that tuned out to be nothing!!!Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
Your words are irrelevant.
The facts matter.
Justice didn't seek a search warrant upon learning that the docs were at Mar a Lago.
They did so after Grifty LIED about having surrendered all of them.
So the issue is CLEARLY NOT the "mishandling".
A) they had a listBuffalo » 13 Jan 2023, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ How did the FBI and/or DOJ even know that Trump had anymore documents? Documents that tuned out to be nothing!!!
what’s it about then?Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ It's not about "improper handling"..
But you'd need to read, rather than rely on someone at FOX to tell you...
Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
Your words are irrelevant.
The facts matter.
Justice didn't seek a search warrant upon learning that the docs were at Mar a Lago.
They did so after Grifty LIED about having surrendered all of them.
So the issue is CLEARLY NOT the "mishandling".
The questions I'd like to hear him respond to in a House-run Congressional hearing (or impeachment proceeding) are:golfboy » 12 Jan 2023, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑ And don't forget that Demented Joe ran his campaign from that house, and spends about half his Presidency there.
And he refuses to release documents regarding who comes to his home, when he's there.
How many hundreds of people had access to America's Top Secrets at Joe's house?
Taint Licking Toady,Huey » 13 Jan 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ It is. But you have to suck Biden's dick at every opportunity. The issue is both broke the law. You want to make it about the aftermath. SO you can protect your hero.
By the way, do you like Obama's dick or Biden's dick the best?
You say something....Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ Taint Licking Toady,
"Worse than Buchanan" to 2ndBesty is a leap well beyond carving love notes into tomorrow's turd with your tongue.
I see... that would be the same DoJ that ordered a raid on Mar-a-Lago when Trump improperly handled classified documents...
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Buck Naked, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Chiseler151, ConsRule, DeplorablePatriot, EDC4ALL!, FJB, FOS, Goodgrief, Google Feedfetcher, Hotblack Desiato, Ike Bana, Jantje_Smit, jerra b, Kobia2, maineman, Majik, Makallbuks, Mirabeau, Monderegal, Mrkelly, murdock, NEILCAR, neue regel, Nostradamus' omh, PaperLi [Bot], Pastor Blast, PhiloBeddo, RebelGator, Redheaded Stranger, roadkill, ROG62, ScottMon, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, Skans, slideman, sooted up Cyndi, SouthernFried, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], sunburn, Taipan, Vegas, walkingstick, Warcok, WindyCocoa, Xavier_Onassis, Yandex [Bot], Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest