This political chat room is for you to sound off about any political ideology and discuss current political topics. Everyone is welcome, yes, even conservatives, but keep in mind, the nature of the No Holds Barred political chat forum platform can be friendly to trolling. It is your responsibility to address this wisely. Forum Rules
User avatar
Buffalo

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 2,043
Location: Central Texas

BuckNaked » 13 Jan 2023, 9:29 am » wrote: Any sex tapes found with dr Jill in them?
No, just showers with young biden daughter Ashley and other under aged little girls.  Dr Jill probably gave up sex with the perverted **** years ago.
 

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 23,145

Antifa
Huey » 13 Jan 2023, 9:28 am » wrote: That's nice.  Not relevant to THE ISSUE of improper handling of classified materials.  Just like Biden.
It's not about "improper handling"..

But you'd need to read, rather than rely on someone at FOX to tell you...

User avatar
Huey

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 15,110
Politics: Liberacon

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 9:34 am » wrote: It's not about "improper handling"..

But you'd need to read, rather than rely on someone at FOX to tell you...
These are my words from earlier:

The issue is that neither properly handled and secured classified documents by taking them out of the WH.  BOTH of them did it.

Now pay attention to this:18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
(b)
For purposes of this section, the provision of documents and materials to the Congress shall not constitute an offense under subsection (a).
(c)
In this section, the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text ... 0Institute

Type this into Google and  you will see the above is the first hit. 

"Penalty for mishandling classified information"

Shove you semantics up your ***.  

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 23,145

Antifa
Huey » 13 Jan 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: These are my words from earlier:

The issue is that neither properly handled and secured classified documents by taking them out of the WH.  BOTH of them did it.

Now pay attention to this:18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
(b)
For purposes of this section, the provision of documents and materials to the Congress shall not constitute an offense under subsection (a).
(c)
In this section, the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text ... 0Institute

Type this into Google and  you will see the above is the first hit. 

"Penalty for mishandling classified information"

Shove you semantics up your ***.
Tiny,

Your words are irrelevant.

The facts matter.

Justice didn't seek a search warrant upon learning that the docs were at Mar a Lago.

They did so after Grifty LIED about having surrendered all of them.

So the issue is CLEARLY NOT the "mishandling".


 

User avatar
roadkill

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 14,516
Politics: Conservative

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 9:48 am » wrote: Tiny,

Your words are irrelevant.

The facts matter.

Justice didn't seek a search warrant upon learning that the docs were at Mar a Lago.

They did so after Grifty LIED about having surrendered all of them.

So the issue is CLEARLY NOT the "mishandling".

Except...yer lying.    :wave:  

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 23,145

Antifa
roadkill » 13 Jan 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: Except...yer lying.    Image
Except, I'm not.

User avatar
Buck Naked

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 893

Buffalo » 13 Jan 2023, 9:34 am » wrote: No, just showers with young biden daughter Ashley and other under aged little girls.  Dr Jill probably gave up sex with the perverted **** years ago.
makes you wander why plugs had to ax her to marry him multiple times before she said yes 

User avatar
Buffalo

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 2,043
Location: Central Texas

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 9:48 am » wrote: Tiny,

Your words are irrelevant.

The facts matter.

Justice didn't seek a search warrant upon learning that the docs were at Mar a Lago.

They did so after Grifty LIED about having surrendered all of them.

So the issue is CLEARLY NOT the "mishandling".
How did the FBI and/or DOJ even know that Trump had anymore documents?  Documents that tuned out to be nothing!!!
 

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 23,145

Antifa
Buffalo » 13 Jan 2023, 9:59 am » wrote: How did the FBI and/or DOJ even know that Trump had anymore documents?  Documents that tuned out to be nothing!!!
A) they had a list

B) someone dropped a dime.

C) you have no idea what's in the documents, idiot.
 
@Vegas  
Last edited by Blackvegetable on 13 Jan 2023, 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Buck Naked

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 893

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 9:34 am » wrote: It's not about "improper handling"..

But you'd need to read, rather than rely on someone at FOX to tell you...
what’s it about then?

User avatar
Huey

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 15,110
Politics: Liberacon

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 9:48 am » wrote: Tiny,

Your words are irrelevant.

The facts matter.

Justice didn't seek a search warrant upon learning that the docs were at Mar a Lago.

They did so after Grifty LIED about having surrendered all of them.

So the issue is CLEARLY NOT the "mishandling".

It is.  But you have to suck Biden's dick at every opportunity.  The issue is both broke the law.  You want to make it about the aftermath.  SO you can protect your hero.

By the way, do you like Obama's dick or Biden's dick the best?

 

User avatar
Jantje_Smit

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 3,577
Politics: Beer and Popcorn
Location: 51°55'58.4"N 4°28'12.2"E

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 9:34 am » wrote: It's not about "improper handling".. 
Says who?

:die:  

Image
 
 

User avatar
Zeets2

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 2,416
Politics: Conservative

golfboy » 12 Jan 2023, 8:30 pm » wrote: And don't forget that Demented Joe ran his campaign from that house, and spends about half his Presidency there. 
And he refuses to release documents regarding who comes to his home, when he's there. 

How many hundreds of people had access to America's Top Secrets at Joe's house?
The questions I'd like to hear him respond to in a House-run Congressional hearing (or impeachment proceeding) are:
1) How many times did his crackhead junkie son visit the home or have access to his garage when Joe wasn't there?
2) Does his crackhead junkie son have a key to the house and/or garage that housed those documents?
3) Who was it that he illegally gave the authority to pack those top secret documents and move them to another location?
4) Could his crackhead junkie son have had his friends, hookers, drug dealers, or business associates visit the home with him either when Joe was there or when he was not?
5) How often did daughter Ashli visit that home either alone or with others there?
6) What's the approximate number of visitors you had to that house over the past 6 years?

There are plenty more, and I only hope they'll make this moron testify live on TV.
No doubt the ratings would go through the roof!
 

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 23,145

Antifa
DoJ


@Vegas  
Last edited by Blackvegetable on 13 Jan 2023, 10:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 23,145

Antifa
Huey » 13 Jan 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: It is.  But you have to suck Biden's dick at every opportunity.  The issue is both broke the law.  You want to make it about the aftermath.  SO you can protect your hero.

By the way, do you like Obama's dick or Biden's dick the best?
Taint Licking Toady,

"Worse than Buchanan" to 2ndBesty is a leap well beyond carving love notes into tomorrow's turd with your tongue.


 

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 23,145

Antifa
BuckNaked » 13 Jan 2023, 10:06 am » wrote: what’s it about then?
I'll tell you if you tell me where you are getting your info...

User avatar
roadkill

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 14,516
Politics: Conservative


You just did it again.

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 23,145

Antifa
roadkill » 13 Jan 2023, 10:34 am » wrote: You just did it again.
Your assertion is insufficient as evidence. 

User avatar
Huey

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 15,110
Politics: Liberacon

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: Taint Licking Toady,

"Worse than Buchanan" to 2ndBesty is a leap well beyond carving love notes into tomorrow's turd with your tongue.
You say something....

Let me know when you understand the issue

User avatar
Jantje_Smit

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 3,577
Politics: Beer and Popcorn
Location: 51°55'58.4"N 4°28'12.2"E

I see... that would be the same DoJ that ordered a raid on Mar-a-Lago when Trump improperly handled classified documents...

To paraphrase Bill... it's the hypocrisy, stupid!

:die: