Rock » 22 Jan 2023, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I called 911 a year ago for my wife and they were here in 5 minutes.
Vegas » 22 Jan 2023, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Was the ambulance hijacked by a couple goat ropers with box cutters?
Of course they were spies! That's what IZRAHELL DOES!
There are many unanswered questions about that day which still remain unanswered and anyone trying to look into it now is pretty much handcuffed by Google which has deplatformed over the years most of the relevant sites which did question the "official" versions of the events that day whom had a massive amount of information contrary to the "official" version.Vegas » 22 Jan 2023, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah yeah yeah....you all will call me a conspiracy theorist, blah blah blah...and yes, I know it happened over two decades ago...blah blah blah...
To this I reply, I don't care.
Below, I listed the things that still bother me. I have listened to the science on both sides, I have listened to the arguments on both sides. I am just not convinced that 19 rag heads could pull this off with box cutters.
1. When you compare the twin towers falling next to past controlled demolitions, they fell the same. Straight down, as if the physics was controlled by human ingenuity. And yes, I have listened to all the experts about how it could be possible...but it's also not probable. Especially three buildings.
2. Building 7 wasn't hit.
3. On 9/10, Rumfield announced that 2.3 trillion dollars had gone missing. On 9/11, a plane crashed into the accounting side of the pentagon.
4. It makes more sense that the plane going down in Pennsylvania was because the goat ropers probably didn't know how to fly the plane. Not because passengers rebelled. A rebellion makes for good emotionally charged narrative to get the public ready to support any counterattack from our government.
5. A new elevator maintenance company was hired months before 9/11. They easily had access to the building's blueprints and structural network.
Gold bullion owned by other sovereign nations and which in 1999 were refused access to their gold for various reasons which makes me suspect there was no gold left to give them.nuckinfutz » 22 Jan 2023, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Building Seven was a depository for BILLIONS of $$ in gold bullion!
Which disappeared after the building collapsed! Hmmmm?
THE COVER UP WAS COMPLETE!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
https://youtu.be/PK_iBYSqEsc
No, I suspect that 9/11 was an inside job and a false flag that launched The Project for a new American Century or PNAC for short which lead to the rise of Globalism and Bush' sr.'s Globalist NWO .....which is now known as The New Liberal world order....or the great reset.Warcok » 22 Jan 2023, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Bill Clinton's responsible for 9/11 with the way he handicapped the CIA
So who got the gold? Rummy?The Jews? The Chinese?Majik » 22 Jan 2023, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Gold bullion owned by other sovereign nations and which in 1999 were refused access to their gold for various reasons which makes me suspect there was no gold left to give them.
Because at that time our tech industry was screaming for gold which was in short supply.
In my opinion it was the MIC who needed a whole **** load of gold for their high tech toys prior to 9/11 and would eventually be used in Iraq and beyond.
BS! Every president since JFK has hated the CIA.Warcok » 22 Jan 2023, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Bill Clinton's responsible for 9/11 with the way he handicapped the CIA
Me-!!!Vegas » 22 Jan 2023, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah yeah yeah....you all will call me a conspiracy theorist, blah blah blah...and yes, I know it happened over two decades ago...blah blah blah...
To this I reply, I don't care.
Below, I listed the things that still bother me. I have listened to the science on both sides, I have listened to the arguments on both sides. I am just not convinced that 19 rag heads could pull this off with box cutters.
1. When you compare the twin towers falling next to past controlled demolitions, they fell the same. Straight down, as if the physics was controlled by human ingenuity. And yes, I have listened to all the experts about how it could be possible...but it's also not probable. Especially three buildings.
2. Building 7 wasn't hit.
3. On 9/10, Rumfield announced that 2.3 trillion dollars had gone missing. On 9/11, a plane crashed into the accounting side of the pentagon.
4. It makes more sense that the plane going down in Pennsylvania was because the goat ropers probably didn't know how to fly the plane. Not because passengers rebelled. A rebellion makes for good emotionally charged narrative to get the public ready to support any counterattack from our government.
5. A new elevator maintenance company was hired months before 9/11. They easily had access to the building's blueprints and structural network.
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, Bob, Buck Naked, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Chiseler151, ConsRule, DeplorablePatriot, EDC4ALL!, FJB, FOS, golfboy, Goodgrief, Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hotblack Desiato, Ike Bana, Jantje_Smit, jerra b, Kobia2, maineman, Majik, Makallbuks, Mirabeau, Monderegal, Mrkelly, murdock, NEILCAR, neue regel, Nostradamus' omh, PaperLi [Bot], Pastor Blast, PhiloBeddo, RebelGator, roadkill, ROG62, ScottMon, SJConspirator, Skans, slideman, sooted up Cyndi, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], sunburn, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Warcok, Xavier_Onassis, Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest