The planning for 9-11 started quite a while before the 2000 election. I remember reading that most of the hijackers were in the US for as long as 18-24 months prior to the attack. The ringleader, a guy named Atta I believe, was in the US as far back as early 1999 from what I can recall.ScottMon » 23 Jan 2023, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑ There's one conspiracy that has bugged me. Bush was a business partner with the Bin Ladin family. After 9/11, He gave permission for the Bin Ladin family to leave America while EVERY other place was grounded. I wonder if Osama attacked because of his family's ties to the Bush family.
RedheadedStranger » 23 Jan 2023, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑ The planning for 9-11 started quite a while before the 2000 election. I remember reading that most of the hijackers were in the US for as long as 18-24 months prior to the attack. The ringleader, a guy named Atta I believe, was in the US as far back as early 1999 from what I can recall.
I remember reading that Osama was pretty much the black sheep of the Bin Ladin family, and most of the immediate family had actually already disowned him over his radical beliefs, prior to the attacks.
I also remember reading that Bush had allowed the Bin Ladins that were in the US to leave after the attack because they were afraid their lives might be in danger because of their relation to Osama.
I haven't read about the attack in years, but did in the immediate aftermath, as most everyone else.
FOS » 23 Jan 2023, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑ there relationship is unknown, according to the official story. But we do know these israelis lived in florida nearby the terrorists as they were taking flying lessons
Monderegal » 23 Jan 2023, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Actually Israel was in crisis mode after 9/11. They deeply feared that the Jewish state would be blamed for the attacks.
Is one from a crash in a field skidding to a stop and the other bashed into the side of a concrete building?Jantje_Smit » 23 Jan 2023, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, I argued for months about it, but it doesn't do any good... it's like the JFK assassination, it's obvious that the official story is **** and there are plenty of conspiracy theories that make much more sense, everyone know but nothing ever happens...
Just for fun, about those engines..
This is the Pentagon
And this is from a real plane crash....
Spot the differences
I heard it was because this relationship was known that they were "evacuated" from the U.S.ScottMon » 23 Jan 2023, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑ There's one conspiracy that has bugged me. Bush was a business partner with the Bin Ladin family. After 9/11, He gave permission for the Bin Ladin family to leave America while EVERY other place was grounded. I wonder if Osama attacked because of his family's ties to the Bush family.
ScottMon » 23 Jan 2023, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑ There's one conspiracy that has bugged me. Bush was a business partner with the Bin Ladin family. After 9/11, He gave permission for the Bin Ladin family to leave America while EVERY other place was grounded. I wonder if Osama attacked because of his family's ties to the Bush family.
True, and great points..RedheadedStranger » 23 Jan 2023, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑ The planning for 9-11 started quite a while before the 2000 election. I remember reading that most of the hijackers were in the US for as long as 18-24 months prior to the attack. The ringleader, a guy named Atta I believe, was in the US as far back as early 1999 from what I can recall.
I remember reading that Osama was pretty much the black sheep of the Bin Ladin family, and most of the immediate family had actually already disowned him over his radical beliefs, prior to the attacks.
I also remember reading that Bush had allowed the Bin Ladins that were in the US to leave after the attack because they were afraid their lives might be in danger because of their relation to Osama.
I haven't read about the attack in years, but did in the immediate aftermath, as most everyone else.
nobody here has blamed Bush. Where do you get this stuff?Kobia2 » 24 Jan 2023, 12:33 am » wrote: ↑ True, and great points..
Yes, Bin Laden had already been disowned by his family in 1994, before he declared his Jihad against against the US in 1996..
And also true the 2001 attack was 3 years in the planning before everything was ready to go... This is a point which those who insist the Bush administration was involved in the planning refuse to accept..
I am bothered by the fact that the US didn't nuke and gas all of Afghanistan into oblivion instead of sending our men to die over there.Vegas » 22 Jan 2023, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah yeah yeah....you all will call me a conspiracy theorist, blah blah blah...and yes, I know it happened over two decades ago...blah blah blah...
To this I reply, I don't care.
Below, I listed the things that still bother me. I have listened to the science on both sides, I have listened to the arguments on both sides. I am just not convinced that 19 rag heads could pull this off with box cutters.
1. When you compare the twin towers falling next to past controlled demolitions, they fell the same. Straight down, as if the physics was controlled by human ingenuity. And yes, I have listened to all the experts about how it could be possible...but it's also not probable. Especially three buildings.
2. Building 7 wasn't hit.
3. On 9/10, Rumfield announced that 2.3 trillion dollars had gone missing. On 9/11, a plane crashed into the accounting side of the pentagon.
4. It makes more sense that the plane going down in Pennsylvania was because the goat ropers probably didn't know how to fly the plane. Not because passengers rebelled. A rebellion makes for good emotionally charged narrative to get the public ready to support any counterattack from our government.
5. A new elevator maintenance company was hired months before 9/11. They easily had access to the building's blueprints and structural network.
ScottMon » 23 Jan 2023, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑ There's one conspiracy that has bugged me. Bush was a business partner with the Bin Ladin family. After 9/11, He gave permission for the Bin Ladin family to leave America while EVERY other place was grounded. I wonder if Osama attacked because of his family's ties to the Bush family.
Vegas » 24 Jan 2023, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ True. Another thing that has bothered me is that Gore should have won the 2000 election. The recount in Florida was a mess and there were too many biased authorities overseeing it. I have to wonder if Bush had to win no matter what, since 9/11 was already in plans.
SJConspirator » 24 Jan 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ Bush himself had nothing to do with it.
The true masterminds of 9/11 were Wolfowitz, Bremer and Cheney
SJConspirator » 24 Jan 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ Bush himself had nothing to do with it.
The true masterminds of 9/11 were Wolfowitz, Bremer and Cheney
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, Buck Naked, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Chiseler151, ConsRule, DeplorablePatriot, EDC4ALL!, FJB, FOS, Goodgrief, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hotblack Desiato, Ike Bana, Jantje_Smit, jerra b, Kobia2, maineman, Majik, Makallbuks, Mirabeau, Monderegal, Mrkelly, murdock, NEILCAR, neue regel, Nostradamus' omh, PaperLi [Bot], Pastor Blast, PhiloBeddo, RebelGator, Redheaded Stranger, roadkill, ROG62, ScottMon, SJConspirator, Skans, slideman, sooted up Cyndi, SouthernFried, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], sunburn, Taipan, Vegas, walkingstick, Warcok, WindyCocoa, Xavier_Onassis, Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest