Squatchman » 14 Sep 2023, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I find it quite telling that a group of people that scream "shall not be infringed" all the time are cheering because a guy cheated on a form that the same people scream infringes on on their 2A rights.
Bruce » 15 Sep 2023, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ I’ll bet since that first 4473 was filled out in 1969 that Hunter Biden is the one and the only person ever prosecuted on the only evidence he was addicted to drugs was his book.
He owned the Cold Cobra 11 days until Hallie Biden got pissed at him and gave it away.
Is that a crime you’d want to be prosecuted for five years later?
Bet it doesn't cover anything leading back to his dad's abuse in offices of senate, vp, president.Bruce » 14 Sep 2023, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, has been indicted by special counsel David Weiss in connection with a gun he purchased in 2018.
The charges include making false statements on a federal firearms form and possession of a firearm as a prohibited person.
http://www.cnn.com/2023/09/14/politics/ ... index.html
Gee, a five year investigation, and only a gun charge?
Spin one for the Republicans
https://youtu.be/Ihs_V92_kyk?si=wGZavluuEH1c3dlu
Let’s all cheer the Second Amendment!
How much money do the trumps need?BuckNaked » 15 Sep 2023, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ The Bidens are a greedy family how much money do they need?
Because there were none.Nostradamus'omh » 15 Sep 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ Bet it doesn't cover anything leading back to his dad's abuse in offices of senate, vp, president.
I dont send anyone money except uncle Sam my quarterly estimated taxesSquatchman » 15 Sep 2023, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ How much money do the trumps need?
Better keep sending those $$$$$ rednecks!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
The neighbor kid wont think so, he came over to visit after doing three years in prison including some extra time for fighting.Xavier_Onassis » 14 Sep 2023, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ This is a very minor charge. He did not use the gun, or even point it at anyone.
everyone is a sinner creates guilty until proven innocent legal system that must be left to god to figure out. Innocent until proven guilty originated by United States of America establishing liberty to choose an ideology rather than have to inherit one.
like what?Str8tEdge » 15 Sep 2023, 2:35 am » wrote: ↑ You think that's why the Obama's murdered the chef? He was coming out with presidential candidate killing info.
plugs will pardon himXavier_Onassis » 14 Sep 2023, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ This is a very minor charge. He did not use the gun, or even point it at anyone.
…..”was so honest…..” …..until he wasn’t, and now he’s a millionaire.Bruce » 14 Sep 2023, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑ The real story is Joe was so honest Beau, Hunter, and Ashley grew up middle class.
And when Hunter and his Uncle Jake got a chance for easy money they took it.
This charge is like being arrested for littering after shooting someone and then tossing the gun on the ground.Squatchman » 15 Sep 2023, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑ And Hunter will most likely walk on the gun charges anyway.
I just read ,like I thought he should do is going to say that the form is vague in its wording, "been convicted for a controlled substance OR addicted to a controlled substance." Not and. And that it infringes on his 2A rights. Because he was never convicted for any drug charge he will most likely add that he embellished his drug use to sell books Not addicted.
I really am amazed at how many of our MAGA mouths don't know **** about good old form # 4473. And that they are all for infringing on others rights but not their own.
In my opinion it scares the pants off most of them that a lot more Democrats are such patriotic gun owners than they first thought.
They like to say"but we have the guns" and I'm sure they do have some. Just not as many as they thought.
man make sex abuse on childXavier_Onassis » 14 Sep 2023, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ This is a very minor charge. He did not use the gun, or even point it at anyone.
make opinion somewhere other placeSquatchman » 15 Sep 2023, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑ And Hunter will most likely walk on the gun charges anyway.
I just read ,like I thought he should do is going to say that the form is vague in its wording, "been convicted for a controlled substance OR addicted to a controlled substance." Not and. And that it infringes on his 2A rights. Because he was never convicted for any drug charge he will most likely add that he embellished his drug use to sell books Not addicted.
I really am amazed at how many of our MAGA mouths don't know **** about good old form # 4473. And that they are all for infringing on others rights but not their own.
In my opinion it scares the pants off most of them that a lot more Democrats are such patriotic gun owners than they first thought.
They like to say"but we have the guns" and I'm sure they do have some. Just not as many as they thought.
What the republicans have to do.
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Bob, Buck Naked, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Chiseler151, ConsRule, d1063n35, Deezer Shoove, EDC4ALL!, FJB, Goodgrief, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, jackowen, jefftec, jerra b, Kobia2, MackTheFinger, Majik, Mrkelly, murdock, NEILCAR, Neo, neue regel, Nostradamus' omh, OdeToJoy, PhiloBeddo, Punch, RebelGator, roadkill, SebastianFenn05, Skans, sooted up Cyndi, Str8tEdge, Sumela, sunburn, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Yandex [Bot], Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest