I might privately come to some personal conclusion about them, but I certainly would not spend a moment of my life capturing their image, posting it here, or anywhere, and then **** WHINING about it. Really. Do you think making a big deal how some civilian chooses to wear their hair is worth the **** bandwidth, let alone a moment of your brain’s discernment? A simple yes/no is all I’m looking for.DeezerShoove » 18 Sep 2023, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The point being that it's akin to judging a book by its cover.
You can... Especially when ******* "present" in the manner of attention whores.
If you tell me you do not judge people by their appearance, I will consider you a basic liar.
^^^ sez Mister Judgy Judgerson.RebelGator » 18 Sep 2023, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ Some people have standards and some don't.
It's been my experience that if you want to look like an idiot, you probably are.
GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Sep 2023, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑
DRIED ****
GENIUS LEVEL ENLIGHTENED PROGRESSIVE
ANYONE WHO THINKS THIS LOOKS COOL is a social trend addicted lemming who would obviously be so easily brainwashed.
Yet here you are in all of your butt hurt splendor....sticking up for your fellow social trend addicted libtard freakazoids and your totally disgusting and grotesque, Sodomite Brotherhood.....maineman » 18 Sep 2023, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I might privately come to some personal conclusion about them, but I certainly would not spend a moment of my life capturing their image, posting it here, or anywhere, and then **** WHINING about it. Really. Do you think making a big deal how some civilian chooses to wear their hair is worth the **** bandwidth, let alone a moment of your brain’s discernment? A simple yes/no is all I’m looking for.
I'm here for entertainment. You're the one that argues a point to the ground.maineman » 18 Sep 2023, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I might privately come to some personal conclusion about them, but I certainly would not spend a moment of my life capturing their image, posting it here, or anywhere, and then **** WHINING about it. Really. Do you think making a big deal how some civilian chooses to wear their hair is worth the **** bandwidth, let alone a moment of your brain’s discernment? A simple yes/no is all I’m looking for.
actually, I’m just here laughing at you and your impossible-to-conceal projection.GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Sep 2023, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Yet here you are in all of your butt hurt splendor....sticking up for your fellow social trend addicted libtard freakazoids and your totally disgusting and grotesque, Sodomite Brotherhood.....
Better than being a groomer and a child danger, fruity.maineman » 17 Sep 2023, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Anyone who spends a nanosecond of their life giving even one small **** about how anyone else chooses to wear their hair, let alone spending any time whatsoever gathering internet photos of them and posting them on a political chat site is a loser of epic proportions….IMHO.
You're too busy fighting for the right of mentally incompetent men dressed in hypersexualized female clown-suits to cavort with prepubescent children.maineman » 18 Sep 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ We aren’t talking about the military. How a civilian chooses to wear his or her hair is none of my concern, none of my business, and certainly nothing I give a **** about.
Maineboy is running a version of the "why do you care" mantra he was taught by his handlers.RebelGator » 18 Sep 2023, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ Some people have standards and some don't.
It's been my experience that if you want to look like an idiot, you probably are.
He's a cheap piece of **** running a trite "why do you care" narrative as trained by his handlers.DeezerShoove » 18 Sep 2023, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The point being that it's akin to judging a book by its cover.
You can... Especially when ******* "present" in the manner of attention whores.
If you tell me you do not judge people by their appearance, I will consider you a basic liar.
Why do you CARE, queer?maineman » 18 Sep 2023, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I might privately come to some personal conclusion about them,
Would you put it in the same category as you *** whining about made up racism, fruity?maineman » 18 Sep 2023, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you think making a big deal how some civilian chooses to wear their hair is worth the **** bandwidth, let alone a moment of your brain’s discernment? A simple yes/no is all I’m looking for.
Right, right - why do people CARE?maineman » 18 Sep 2023, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑
My question was, who seriously gives a **** and, if you do, what does that say about the emptiness and triviality of your life?
Correct. Maineboy is deploying the WHY DO YOU CARE defense, as instructed by her handlers.GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Sep 2023, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Yet here you are in all of your butt hurt splendor....sticking up for your fellow social trend addicted libtard freakazoids and your totally disgusting and grotesque, Sodomite Brotherhood.....
Why do you care so much, queer?maineman » 18 Sep 2023, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑ actually, I’m just here laughing at you and your impossible-to-conceal projection.
Your tears are my oxygen....maineman » 18 Sep 2023, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑ actually, I’m just here laughing at you and your impossible-to-conceal projection.
It's hard to imagine a "successful" career military man suddenly seeing there is no value in uniformity.Cannonpointer » 18 Sep 2023, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑ He's a cheap piece of **** running a trite "why do you care" narrative as trained by his handlers.
I don’t. Really. I figured out a long time ago that the world was littered with ******* like you and there was nothing I could do beyond devaluing you to zero, which I did quite some time ago. Have fun.
I value uniformity in the military. I applaud diversity everywhere else. I’d like to think that I was always enlightened and accepting of other people’s choices, but my three adult kids brought me the rest of the way around. Now… the only people I want to see run down by a bus - or, better yet, gunned down by a firing squad - are the MAGA MORON J6ers who seem willing to throw the Constitution itself under the bus to glorify their charlatan, con-man orange clown god. I took an oath not to a country or to a governmental position, but to the Constitution and nowhere in that document does it mention hair styles. It ain’t my circus and they ain’t my monkeys.DeezerShoove » 18 Sep 2023, 9:50 pm » wrote: ↑ It's hard to imagine a "successful" career military man suddenly seeing there is no value in uniformity.
Ergo, people intentionally trying to stand out would be considered worthy of harsh judgement.
Pretending he is enlghtened after all the pissing contests about military service and the like just cements the notion that he's faking it about not caring about bath-mat colored hair and other **** weirdo signaling.
He may wish he didn't care... and secretly hope the ******* get run down by a bus.
But then again, so do I.
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Buck Naked, Cannonpointer, ConsRule, FJB, GHETTO BLASTER, Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hank, Jantje_Smit, jerra b, Kobia2, MackTheFinger, Majik, Mirabeau, Mrkelly, murdock, neue regel, PhiloBeddo, PoliticalPopUp, RebelGator, roadkill, Skans, sooted up Cyndi, Str8tEdge, Sumela, sunburn, tsmco, Twitter [Bot], walkingstick, Yandex [Bot], Z09 and 1 guest