Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑again with 2019
wht didn't tRump do anything when he had full control in 16 and 17 ?
You're in the perfect thread. A good example of a Juvenille Retardo!!!
What are you attempting to say? This rant resembles something of @Nostradamus' omh .LowIQTrash » 17 Sep 2023, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ It's hilarious how backwards people's thoughts are - and that is assuming they "think" or are capable of "thinking" at all.
IN case you failed to read the Constitution, ALL spending originates in the House of Representatives. The PRESIDENT has ZERO authority to originate ANY new spending on anything.It's the reason WHY your boy Biden's "College loan forgiveness" plan was SLAPPED DOWN by the Courts. NO EXECUTIVE ORDER can spend money.Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ Giving tRump cover for being the phony he is
what about executive orders?
where did they stop tRump in 16 or 17 from doing that?
Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑2019
I know they stopped him when they had the power
now show where they stopped the wall in 2016-2017 when tRump had both houses
you made my pointBeekeeper » 18 Sep 2023, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ IN case you failed to read the Constitution, ALL spending originates in the House of Representatives. The PRESIDENT has ZERO authority to originate ANY new spending on anything.It's the reason WHY your boy Biden's "College loan forgiveness" plan was SLAPPED DOWN by the Courts. NO EXECUTIVE ORDER can spend money.
See, you LWNJs are FAR MORE STUPID than anyone could possibly imagine.
Honesty verse corruption of the many governed by the few. Remember governing incoming replacements to think about tomorrow never allows anyone pretending now isn't eternity to understand now is eternity specifically as evolving individually here in series parallel time genetics are displaced by the exact people alive now.Skans » 18 Sep 2023, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ What are you attempting to say? This rant resembles something of Nostradamus' omh .
You're PROVING MY POINT, ****!!Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ you made my point
tRump had control of the House of Representatives
and tRump did have an executive order to build the wall, and it failed ... Executive Order 13767
he waited to issue it so the Dems could be blamed for stopping it
if he had done it at the beginning, he could have done it
but he just wasn't really into it
he just wanted a show
And then we have this little ditty!!Sec. 2 . Policy. It is the policy of the executive branch to:
(a) secure the southern border of the United States through the immediate construction of a physical wall on the southern border, monitored and supported by adequate personnel so as to prevent illegal immigration, drug and human trafficking, and acts of terrorism;
So, his EO was to BUILD THE WALL based on CURRENT LAWS, and it took CONGRESS to APPROPRIATE THE FUNDS, which SCHUMER BLOCKED AT ALL COSTS!! He even REFUSED to negotiate ANY funding for that wall construction!! NO WHERE does he APPROPRIATE FUNDS for this action, but instead, TRIED to use EXISTING LAWS to get the appropriations needed.Sec. 4 . Physical Security of the Southern Border of the United States. The Secretary shall immediately take the following steps to obtain complete operational control, as determined by the Secretary, of the southern border:
(a) In accordance with existing law, including the Secure Fence Act and IIRIRA, take all appropriate steps to immediately plan, design, and construct a physical wall along the southern border, using appropriate materials and technology to most effectively achieve complete operational control of the southern border;
(b) Identify and, to the extent permitted by law, allocate all sources of Federal funds for the planning, designing, and constructing of a physical wall along the southern border;
He didn’t need Schumer to do **** the first two yearsBeekeeper » 18 Sep 2023, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You're PROVING MY POINT, ****!!
And then we have this little ditty!!
So, his EO was to BUILD THE WALL based on CURRENT LAWS, and it took CONGRESS to APPROPRIATE THE FUNDS, which SCHUMER BLOCKED AT ALL COSTS!! He even REFUSED to negotiate ANY funding for that wall construction!! NO WHERE does he APPROPRIATE FUNDS for this action, but instead, TRIED to use EXISTING LAWS to get the appropriations needed.
Now, SHUT THE **** UP and spit that **** out of your cum filled mouth!!
When was #13767..... issued?Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ you made my point
tRump had control of the House of Representatives
and tRump did have an executive order to build the wall, and it failed ... Executive Order 13767
he waited to issue it so the Dems could be blamed for stopping it
if he had done it at the beginning, he could have done it
but he just wasn't really into it
he just wanted a show
Psssst. *******.Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑ He didn’t need Schumer to do **** the first two years
the republicans controlled the purse, and the senate
tRump waited until it would be a political thing to do anything
he is a hack
When tRump signed his wall executive orderBeekeeper » 18 Sep 2023, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Psssst. *******.
Controlling the Senate means you have 60 votes to effect CLOTURE. When a Senator decides he won't vote for it, he can FILIBUSTER any bill out there. So there was NOT 60 Republicans at the time, ASSWIPE!! And Schumer said he would FILIBUSTER any spending on the wall.
You are really dense as it gets.
sootedupCyndi » 18 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ You're in the perfect thread. A good example of a Juvenille Retardo!!!
In fairness, the democ rats have seen to it that israelis and ukes have socialized medicine. That's the most important thing - not Americans.LowIQTrash » 18 Sep 2023, 1:04 am » wrote: ↑ I almost forgot to mention. I SPECIFICALLY REMEMBER guys at some liberal-dominated forum screaming that the ACA (Obamacare) would be a "stepping stone" toward "Medicare4All." This was in 2009.
Well it's been over a decade and there is nothing remotely approaching M4A. The DemoCRAPS don't give a ****
Yup. The *** posted porn, right after I rescued him from another mod he had pissed off.LowIQTrash » 18 Sep 2023, 1:12 am » wrote: ↑ Also, how come I can't see nuckin futz's post in this thread? Is he **** for some reason?
When there wasn't a 2/3 to begin with, there won't be a 2/3 when he vetoes it. Mpt with how elected officials call themselves leaders of ideologies instead of representatives to the people that didn't vote for them as much as those that did.Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑ When tRump signed his wall executive order
if the senate voted it down
Couldn’t he veto that decision
and force them to overturn his veto with a 2/3 vote?
Tis better to have people to think you are a fool than to open your mouth and prove it.Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑ When tRump signed his wall executive order
if the senate voted it down
Couldn’t he veto that decision
and force them to overturn his veto with a 2/3 vote?
sootedupCyndi » 18 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ You're in the perfect thread. A good example of a Juvenille Retardo!!!
The democrats made it a big deal that Trump promised in a campaign speech he'd make Mexico pay for it. That didn't happen, of course. Most campaign promises have a difficult time coming true when declaring what a different country's government will honor.Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑ When tRump signed his wall executive order
if the senate voted it down
Couldn’t he veto that decision
and force them to overturn his veto with a 2/3 vote?
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Bob, Buck Naked, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Chiseler151, ConsRule, d1063n35, EDC4ALL!, FJB, Goodgrief, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, jackowen, jerra b, Kobia2, MackTheFinger, maineman, Majik, Mrkelly, murdock, NEILCAR, Neo, neue regel, Nostradamus' omh, OdeToJoy, PhiloBeddo, Punch, RebelGator, Redheaded Stranger, roadkill, SebastianFenn05, Skans, sooted up Cyndi, Sumela, sunburn, Twitter [Bot], walkingstick, Yandex [Bot], Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest