Sheet! That's about the time i chose to reincarnate. Should i re-think that?Skans » 18 Sep 2023, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ And, no one cares.......WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA![]()
![]()
Yes. I hear 2375 is best for reincarnation. You don't need any money and you can ride around on a luxury spaceship killing aliens. Oh, and the Borg makes all females look like her:sootedupCyndi » 18 Sep 2023, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Sheet! That's about the time i chose to reincarnate. Should i re-think that?
I don't like the haircut!Skans » 18 Sep 2023, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes. I hear 2375 is best for reincarnation. You don't need any money and you can ride around on a luxury spaceship killing aliens. Oh, and the Borg makes all females look like her:
You ever notice how average looking women are referred to as "stunning" if they have big jugs?
Not just "big jugs".....stunning jugs!DeezerShoove » 18 Sep 2023, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ You ever notice how average looking women are referred to as "stunning" if they have big jugs?
Lots of tits are stunning in a bra...
And the stunning ones are seen as average with a flat top.DeezerShoove » 18 Sep 2023, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ You ever notice how average looking women are referred to as "stunning" if they have big jugs?
Spoken like a true tit man.Cannonpointer » 18 Sep 2023, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ And the stunning ones are seen as average with a flat top.
Yes, there's a lot of truth to that statement. Thus why I always preferred women with smaller boobs. I know, @Buck Naked and @Sumela will likely take this as blasphemy, or even claim I'm a homosexual, but those small boobs look better on a naked woman in my opinion.
To me "average" is if a pencil can barely be held under the breast.Skans » 19 Sep 2023, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, there's a lot of truth to that statement. Thus why I always preferred women with smaller boobs. I know, @Buck Naked and @Sumela will likely take this as blasphemy, or even claim I'm a homosexual, but those small boobs look better on a naked woman in my opinion.
Or, perhaps they can play with boobies and make climate predictions. I predict that if some of these sis-generation males play with some boobies more often, they will forget about obsessing over the weather.DeezerShoove » 19 Sep 2023, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑ back to OP:
Climatologists should find an interest in something useful like phrenology.
to each their ownSkans » 19 Sep 2023, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, there's a lot of truth to that statement. Thus why I always preferred women with smaller boobs. I know, @Buck Naked and @Sumela will likely take this as blasphemy, or even claim I'm a homosexual, but those small boobs look better on a naked woman in my opinion.
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, berniebro, Bill Gates [Bot], Bruce, Buck Naked, Buffalo, Chiseler151, ConsRule, Deezer Shoove, FJB, GHETTO BLASTER, Goodgrief, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, IamWoman, impartialobserver, Jantje_Smit, jefftec, jerra b, Justin Sane, Kobia2, LowIQTrash, MackTheFinger, Majik, Mrkelly, murdock, Neo, neue regel, OdeToJoy, Pasta’sVengeance, PhiloBeddo, Punch, RebelGator, ROG62, Skans, sooted up Cyndi, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], Str8tEdge, Sumela, Tempest62, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Yandex [Bot], Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest