Sheet! That's about the time i chose to reincarnate. Should i re-think that?Skans » 18 Sep 2023, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ And, no one cares.......WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA![]()
![]()
Yes. I hear 2375 is best for reincarnation. You don't need any money and you can ride around on a luxury spaceship killing aliens. Oh, and the Borg makes all females look like her:sootedupCyndi » 18 Sep 2023, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Sheet! That's about the time i chose to reincarnate. Should i re-think that?
I don't like the haircut!Skans » 18 Sep 2023, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes. I hear 2375 is best for reincarnation. You don't need any money and you can ride around on a luxury spaceship killing aliens. Oh, and the Borg makes all females look like her:
You ever notice how average looking women are referred to as "stunning" if they have big jugs?
Not just "big jugs".....stunning jugs!DeezerShoove » 18 Sep 2023, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ You ever notice how average looking women are referred to as "stunning" if they have big jugs?
Lots of tits are stunning in a bra...
And the stunning ones are seen as average with a flat top.DeezerShoove » 18 Sep 2023, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ You ever notice how average looking women are referred to as "stunning" if they have big jugs?
Spoken like a true tit man.Cannonpointer » 18 Sep 2023, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ And the stunning ones are seen as average with a flat top.
Yes, there's a lot of truth to that statement. Thus why I always preferred women with smaller boobs. I know, @Buck Naked and @Sumela will likely take this as blasphemy, or even claim I'm a homosexual, but those small boobs look better on a naked woman in my opinion.
To me "average" is if a pencil can barely be held under the breast.Skans » 19 Sep 2023, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, there's a lot of truth to that statement. Thus why I always preferred women with smaller boobs. I know, @Buck Naked and @Sumela will likely take this as blasphemy, or even claim I'm a homosexual, but those small boobs look better on a naked woman in my opinion.
Or, perhaps they can play with boobies and make climate predictions. I predict that if some of these sis-generation males play with some boobies more often, they will forget about obsessing over the weather.DeezerShoove » 19 Sep 2023, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑ back to OP:
Climatologists should find an interest in something useful like phrenology.
to each their ownSkans » 19 Sep 2023, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, there's a lot of truth to that statement. Thus why I always preferred women with smaller boobs. I know, @Buck Naked and @Sumela will likely take this as blasphemy, or even claim I'm a homosexual, but those small boobs look better on a naked woman in my opinion.
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Bob, Buck Naked, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Chiseler151, ConsRule, d1063n35, Deezer Shoove, EDC4ALL!, FJB, GHETTO BLASTER, Goodgrief, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, jackowen, jefftec, jerra b, Kobia2, MackTheFinger, Majik, Mrkelly, murdock, NEILCAR, Neo, neue regel, Nostradamus' omh, OdeToJoy, PhiloBeddo, Punch, RebelGator, roadkill, SebastianFenn05, Skans, sooted up Cyndi, Str8tEdge, Sumela, sunburn, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Yandex [Bot], Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest