Biden-appointed women who get away with violating federal laws have a picture-perfect snatch that smells like intoxicating perfume.
What federal laws has she violated?Skans » 19 Sep 2023, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ Biden-appointed women who get away with violating federal laws have a picture-perfect snatch that smells like intoxicating perfume.
black hair or black? I bet it’s pinkRebelGator » 19 Sep 2023, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑ Black, hairy fur dragging around a flat tail with killer teeth.
Perjury. Violating her oath of office.
she can’t take it back? It was an oversightSkans » 19 Sep 2023, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ Perjury. Violating her oath of office.
Federal Criminal Penalty for Violation of Oath of Office Federal criminal law is explicit and direct regarding a violation of oath of office by federal officials which includes all members of Congress. The law requires the removal of the office holder as well a prison term or fine for the offender. 18 U.S.C. 1918:
you notice the Demonrats new question: what federal laws has *** broken?Skans » 19 Sep 2023, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ Perjury. Violating her oath of office.
Federal Criminal Penalty for Violation of Oath of Office Federal criminal law is explicit and direct regarding a violation of oath of office by federal officials which includes all members of Congress. The law requires the removal of the office holder as well a prison term or fine for the offender. 18 U.S.C. 1918:
She should be charged with two crimes. Then, let the jury decide whether she can "take it back" or not. Of course, the Democrats DOJ has no interest in investigating or prosecuting crimes committed by Democrats.
I don't assume that Buck Naked is a Democrat. He could be, but I've seen him make some pretty conservative comments in the past. He is (sometimes) good at asking short, succinct questions that challenge what someone has said. That, and titties, are his "thing".sunburn » 19 Sep 2023, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ you notice the Demonrats new question: what federal laws has *** broken?
we answer them all the time and they still ignore or remain "dumb".
what two crimes?Skans » 19 Sep 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ She should be charged with two crimes. Then, let the jury decide whether she can "take it back" or not. Of course, the Democrats DOJ has no interest in investigating or prosecuting crimes committed by Democrats.
WHICH ONE?
I already told you. Go back and read, I don't like to repeat myself.
LIKE TALKING TO THE DELINQUENT KID IN THE CLASSROOMSkans » 19 Sep 2023, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ I already told you. Go back and read, I don't like to repeat myself.
the one whose naked body is all over the internet revenge porn my ***righteous » 19 Sep 2023, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑ WHICH ONE?
THEY BOTH APPEAR TO BE NATURAL BLONDES.
YOU CAN ONLY GUESS? MAYBE ONE OF THEM IS SHAVED
YOU GETTING HORNY YET, BUCK NAKED?
Granholm sucked as governor of Michigan.
greasy face lolDeezerShoove » 19 Sep 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Granholm sucked as governor of Michigan.
I didn't think we could, as a state, do worse... oops, I was wrong.
FIRST OF ALL, SHE'S NOT AMERICAN BORN. A WOKE CANADIAN FROM VANCOUVER. I BELIEVE SHE SIMPLY COULD CARE LESS ABOUT HER ADOPTED COUNTRY.DeezerShoove » 19 Sep 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Granholm sucked as governor of Michigan.
I didn't think we could, as a state, do worse... oops, I was wrong.
WHOSE BODY IS ALL OVER THE INTERNET?BuckNaked » 19 Sep 2023, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑ the one whose naked body is all over the internet revenge porn my ***
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Bob, Buck Naked, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Chiseler151, ConsRule, d1063n35, Deezer Shoove, EDC4ALL!, FJB, Goodgrief, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, jackowen, jefftec, jerra b, Kobia2, MackTheFinger, Majik, Mrkelly, murdock, NEILCAR, Neo, neue regel, Nostradamus' omh, OdeToJoy, PhiloBeddo, Punch, RebelGator, roadkill, SebastianFenn05, Skans, sooted up Cyndi, Str8tEdge, Sumela, sunburn, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Yandex [Bot], Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest