Can Inequality Be Good?

[nuckin futz]

nuckin futz said:

I cannot think of a more apt moment to post this

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_j56IiLqZ9U

[Str8tEdge]

Str8tEdge said:

Hear out my position on this. Is there an argument to be made that the process of getting rich in the private sector also benefits society? Is the need to rely on the government to benefit our lives a failed model due to the short comings of socialism? Many would say that the high taxes in blue states are a hamper to the economy and provide little utility. So should we lower taxes or try to more adequately fund vital programs like Social Security?

I solved the FICA tax problem, gave every working American a large raise  and eliminated ALL inequality in business with one stone.

Eliminate all business taxes(and tax breaks).

All businesses pay 100% of FICA taxes for their employees, revisited every 3 years and raised accordingly.

[ConsRule]

ConsRule said:

So, to bottom line it, **** piles like cali, working with **** piles like the autocrats in DC, can **** a thing up - but it doesn't make the THING bad; it makes the **** piles bad.

We on the same page, there? That's what you're saying?

I mean, you're NOT saying we need prohibition because california sucks - right?
 

Did I say that?  I mean, you can read...right?

I'm saying your contention that legalization takes the dealer (criminal) out of the equation is not necessarily true. It may be true, but it may be complete ****.

 

[Cannonpointer]

Cannonpointer said:

Did I say that?  I mean, you can read...right?

I mean, I ASKED, right?

I've found when talking with women, a LOT of time is spent seeking clarity - which often results in hysteria and screeching.

I'm saying your contention that legalization takes the dealer (criminal) out of the equation is not necessarily true. It may be true, but it may be complete ****.

Right.

So if dishonest servants of the drug lords deliberately botch the end of prohibition, that can hamstring the public. But like you said - or seemed to say, young lady, - that does not reflect against the sagacity of ending the retarded and unConstitutional horror that is prohibition. It reflects on dishonest public servants.
 

[ConsRule]

ConsRule said:

I mean, I ASKED, right?

I've found when talking with women, a LOT of time is spent seeking clarity - which often results in hysteria and screeching.

Right.

So if dishonest servants of the drug lords deliberately botch the end of prohibition, that can hamstring the public. But like you said - or seemed to say, young lady, - that does not reflect against the sagacity of ending the retarded and unConstitutional horror that is prohibition. It reflects on dishonest public servants.

When you grow up, get back to me.  We can continue the discussion then.
 

[Cannonpointer]

Cannonpointer said:

When you grow up, get back to me.  We can continue the discussion then.

When your balls drop, kid, you do the same. 

Until then, you will be mocked at will - and free to respond, whine, ignore, what have you. 
 

[GHETTO BLASTER]

GHETTO BLASTER said:

Hear out my position on this. Is there an argument to be made that the process of getting rich in the private sector also benefits society? Is the need to rely on the government to benefit our lives a failed model due to the short comings of socialism? Many would say that the high taxes in blue states are a hamper to the economy and provide little utility. So should we lower taxes or try to more adequately fund vital programs like Social Security?

Whose gonna want to do the nastiest jobs or the toughest jobs for equal pay alongside someone who gets paid to do next to nothing with no skill or pain for the same pay ...?
 

[Nostradamus' omh]

Nostradamus' omh said:

:puke:

I am sure you did. How does relative time theory change actual time evolving here as one of a kind? Mentally day dreaming anything else is possible or flat out denying now is eternity?