This political chat room is for you to sound off about any political ideology and discuss current political topics. Everyone is welcome, yes, even conservatives, but keep in mind, the nature of the No Holds Barred political chat forum platform can be friendly to trolling. It is your responsibility to address this wisely. Forum Rules
User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 45,175

Antifa
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 9:35 am » wrote:
BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was
What does the Green indicate?

Does it indicate The Track of the storm?


Please limit yourself to citations.

User avatar
Huey

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 25,631
Politics: Liberacon

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 9:43 am » wrote:
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 9:35 am » wrote:
BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was
What does the Green indicate?

Does it indicate The Track of the storm?

Please limit yourself to citations.
BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402


There certainly was

Argue with NOAA.

User avatar
Termin8tor

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,513
Politics: Conservative

Misty » 04 Sep 2019 4:12 pm » wrote: Just saw him on TV still sticking with his lie that Alabama was in the original forecast.
And the King of the black sharpie has no idea how that black mark got on the map.
The man is so incapable of ever admitting he was wrong about anything that it looks like he may have altered an official NOAA map, which is illegal.
You should stay away from actual issues, psycho.
Stick to cartoon propaganda.

That's your speed. :rofl:
NOAA Delivers The Death Blow To The Liberal Media Over Trump's Hurricane Dorian Map Controversy
Matt VespaMatt Vespa.....
From Wednesday, August 28, through Monday, September 2, the information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama. This is clearly demonstrated in Hurricane Advisories #15 through #41, which can be viewed at thefollowing link.

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2019/D ... bs_34_F120


The Birmingham National Weather Service’s Sunday morning tweet spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time.

I mean it’s almost becoming embarrassing how the liberal media gets played, slapped down, and utterly owned every time they try to attack this presidency. Trump is an absolute professional at making them look like morons :rofl: :rofl:
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa ... s-n2552738

User avatar
Termin8tor

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,513
Politics: Conservative

Misty » 04 Sep 2019 4:24 pm » wrote: Do you have a link to that map that shows it headed towards Alabama on Sept. 1st?
I just cited one, wackjob.

.

Image

User avatar
Huey

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 25,631
Politics: Liberacon

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 9:33 am » wrote:
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 9:31 am » wrote:
You tell me.
Because you are incapable of doing so?
NOAA backs Trump on Alabama forecast, and rebukes Weather Service office that accurately contradicted him

WASHINGTON - The federal agency that oversees the National Weather Service has sided with President Donald Trump over its own scientists in the ongoing controversy over whether Alabama was at risk of a direct hit from Hurricane Dorian.
In a statement released Friday afternoon, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stated Alabama was in fact threatened by the storm at the time Trump tweeted Alabama would "most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated."
Referencing archived hurricane advisories, the NOAA statement said that information provided to the president and the public between Aug. 28 and Sept. 2 "demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama
In an unusual move, the statement also admonished its National Weather Service office in Birmingham, Alabama, which had released a tweet contradicting Trump's claim and stating, "Alabama will NOT see any impacts from #Dorian."
The NOAA statement said: "The Birmingham National Weather Service's Sunday morning tweet spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/a ... 420459.php

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Share      Unread post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 22,775
Politics: Insurrectionist
Location: Your sister's bedroom - the slutty one

WhistleSNAP
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 9:49 am » wrote: NOAA backs Trump on Alabama forecast, and rebukes Weather Service office that accurately contradicted him
Interesting choice of words.

Could someone be toying with you? :huh:
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 9:49 am » wrote: WASHINGTON - The federal agency that oversees the National Weather Service has sided with President Donald Trump over its own scientists
BAM!

Nailed her stupid ***!

User avatar
Huey

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 25,631
Politics: Liberacon

Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2019 9:54 am » wrote:
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 9:49 am » wrote: NOAA backs Trump on Alabama forecast, and rebukes Weather Service office that accurately contradicted him
Interesting choice of words.

Could someone be toying with you? :huh:
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 9:49 am » wrote: WASHINGTON - The federal agency that oversees the National Weather Service has sided with President Donald Trump over its own scientists
BAM!

Nailed her stupid ***!
In a statement released Friday afternoon, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stated Alabama was in fact threatened by the storm at the time Trump tweeted Alabama would "most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated."
Referencing archived hurricane advisories, the NOAA statement said that information provided to the president and the public between Aug. 28 and Sept. 2 "demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Share      Unread post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 22,775
Politics: Insurrectionist
Location: Your sister's bedroom - the slutty one

WhistleSNAP
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 10:05 am » wrote:
In a statement released Friday afternoon, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stated Alabama was in fact threatened by the storm at the time Trump tweeted Alabama would "most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated."
Referencing archived hurricane advisories, the NOAA statement said that information provided to the president and the public between Aug. 28 and Sept. 2 "demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama
If you go back a few years farther, Alabama has been threatened several times.

I'm trying to agree with you here.

User avatar
Huey

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 25,631
Politics: Liberacon

Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2019 10:07 am » wrote:
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 10:05 am » wrote:
In a statement released Friday afternoon, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stated Alabama was in fact threatened by the storm at the time Trump tweeted Alabama would "most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated."
Referencing archived hurricane advisories, the NOAA statement said that information provided to the president and the public between Aug. 28 and Sept. 2 "demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama
If you go back a few years farther, Alabama has been threatened several times.

I'm trying to agree with you here.
Ok. My bad.

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 45,175

Antifa
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 9:49 am » wrote:
NOAA backs Trump on Alabama forecast, and rebukes Weather Service office that accurately contradicted him

WASHINGTON - The federal agency that oversees the National Weather Service has sided with President Donald Trump over its own scientists in the ongoing controversy over whether Alabama was at risk of a direct hit from Hurricane Dorian.
In a statement released Friday afternoon, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stated Alabama was in fact threatened by the storm at the time Trump tweeted Alabama would "most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated."
Referencing archived hurricane advisories, the NOAA statement said that information provided to the president and the public between Aug. 28 and Sept. 2 "demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama
In an unusual move, the statement also admonished its National Weather Service office in Birmingham, Alabama, which had released a tweet contradicting Trump's claim and stating, "Alabama will NOT see any impacts from #Dorian."
The NOAA statement said: "The Birmingham National Weather Service's Sunday morning tweet spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/a ... 420459.php

This has shot well past pathetic..

Is this the "unsigned statement"?
Trump tweeted Alabama would "most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated."
What does The Green represent?

Just tell us and "the point" is made.
Would "most likely" sit at that end of the spectrum?

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 45,175

Antifa
To whom it may concern,


The dog ate Little Grifty's homework...

Signed,

My mom

User avatar
Huey

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 25,631
Politics: Liberacon

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 10:12 am » wrote:
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 9:49 am » wrote:
NOAA backs Trump on Alabama forecast, and rebukes Weather Service office that accurately contradicted him

WASHINGTON - The federal agency that oversees the National Weather Service has sided with President Donald Trump over its own scientists in the ongoing controversy over whether Alabama was at risk of a direct hit from Hurricane Dorian.
In a statement released Friday afternoon, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stated Alabama was in fact threatened by the storm at the time Trump tweeted Alabama would "most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated."
Referencing archived hurricane advisories, the NOAA statement said that information provided to the president and the public between Aug. 28 and Sept. 2 "demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama
In an unusual move, the statement also admonished its National Weather Service office in Birmingham, Alabama, which had released a tweet contradicting Trump's claim and stating, "Alabama will NOT see any impacts from #Dorian."
The NOAA statement said: "The Birmingham National Weather Service's Sunday morning tweet spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/a ... 420459.php

This has shot well past pathetic..

Is this the "unsigned statement"?
Trump tweeted Alabama would "most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated."
What does The Green represent?

Just tell us and "the point" is made.
Would "most likely" sit at that end of the spectrum?
Yes, your continued spin and twists trying to justify your statement is pathetic

BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402


There certainly was

Argue with NOAA

User avatar
John Miller

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Trump Publicist
Posts: 3

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 10:14 am » wrote:To whom it may concern,

The dog ate Little Grifty's homework...

Signed,

My mom
Mr. Trump has never dummied up a note that bad. People from every side of the political spectrum are telling me that Mr. Trump dummies up the best notes.

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 45,175

Antifa
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 10:17 am » wrote:
Yes, your continued spin and twists trying to justify your statement is pathetic

BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was

Argue with NOAA
What does the green represent, Tiny..

Just post the number

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 45,175

Antifa
Huey » 07 Sep 2019 10:05 am » wrote:
In a statement released Friday afternoon, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stated Alabama was in fact threatened by the storm at the time Trump tweeted Alabama would "most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated."
Referencing archived hurricane advisories, the NOAA statement said that information provided to the president and the public between Aug. 28 and Sept. 2 "demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama
Your tax dollars at work.


Imagine if we had a spending problem

This must be the most humiliating episode in the history of weather service.

Obliged to pen a rationalization for Willful Stupidity Born of Indolence, the call goes out for someone to sign - and EVERYONE refuses.

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Share      Unread post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 22,775
Politics: Insurrectionist
Location: Your sister's bedroom - the slutty one

WhistleSNAP
Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 10:30 am » wrote:
Your tax dollars at work.

Imagine if we had a spending problem

This must be the most humiliating episode in the history of weather service.

Obliged to pen a rationalization for Willful Stupidity Born of Indolence, the call goes out for someone to sign - and EVERYONE refuses.
When you deliberately show it in the most negative light, you can make anything look hinky.

User avatar
John Barron

Share      Unread post

User avatar
 
 
Posts: 5

Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2019 10:40 am » wrote:
Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 10:30 am » wrote:
Your tax dollars at work.

Imagine if we had a spending problem

This must be the most humiliating episode in the history of weather service.

Obliged to pen a rationalization for Willful Stupidity Born of Indolence, the call goes out for someone to sign - and EVERYONE refuses.
When you deliberately show it in the most negative light, you can make anything look hinky.
He's right. The only issue is whether NOAA backed the president. And it did. Officially. On its letterhead.

User avatar
deadeyeshot

Share      Unread post

User avatar
 
 
Posts: 42

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 8:42 am » wrote:
Do you see Alabama mentioned?

**** inbred cretin
Sorry you can't read a map, you ghetto rat

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 45,175

Antifa
Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2019 10:40 am » wrote: When you deliberately show it in the most negative light, you can make anything look hinky.
Unless he's wearing a pant suit, of course.

But seriously, assuming I was possessed of such lofty ambition, how would I go about trying to make The Grifter look " hinkier"?

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 45,175

Antifa
deadeyeshot » 07 Sep 2019 10:43 am » wrote: Sorry you can't read a map, you ghetto rat
What does the green indicate?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Annoyed Liberall, Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Buffalo, Cannonpointer, ConsRule, DeplorablePatriot, Famagusta, FOS, freeman, GHETTO BLASTER, Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hank, Holdor, Ike Bana, impartialobserver, Independent, Jantje_Smit, jeffey17, jefftec, Jinn Martini, Monderegal, murdock, nefarious101, NEILCAR, Neo, neue regel, one1zer0, PaperLi [Bot], razoo, roadkill, ScottMon, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, sooted up Cyndi, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], thelion, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Warcok, Wayback Machine [Bot], Xavier_Onassis, Yandex [Bot], Zeets2 and 567 guests