This political chat room is for you to sound off about any political ideology and discuss current political topics. Everyone is welcome, yes, even conservatives, but keep in mind, the nature of the No Holds Barred political chat forum platform can be friendly to trolling. It is your responsibility to address this wisely. Forum Rules

Will the US eventually put foots on the ground against Russia?

Yes
5
24%
No
13
62%
Don't know
3
14%
 
Total votes: 21

User avatar
Jinn Martini

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
Posts: 3,921
Politics: Conservative
Location: Valdez, ALASKA

Taipan » 09 May 2022, 4:07 pm » wrote: Ukraine are friends with NATO.
Ukraine is the 'buffer-zone' between Russia & E.U. NATO.
It is the NATO Brick-wall that will stop Russian Communism & Chinese Communism.

Finland & Sweden are now pushing hard to join NATO.
How about if more & more nations join NATO ?                                    
Image
Sober up, cowboy !

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Share      Unread post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 22,701
Politics: Insurrectionist
Location: Your sister's bedroom - the slutty one

WhistleSNAP
Taipan » 09 May 2022, 4:56 pm » wrote: That is changing very quickly.      NATO is arming-up, right now.
The NATO Brick-Wall will stop the Communist Aggression of power-hungry dictators
like Karl Marx, Joe Stalin, Nikita Khrushchev, & Vlad Putin.
WE (& Canada)...........are a part of NATO.    
WE......will assist E.U. NATO with any problem that they run across.

"United we stand.......divided we fall".

Yeah yeah blah blah, sis boom bah, go biden go biden rah rah rah - sissy.

NATO's budget hasn't changed, fruit loop - but if you say something really tough, it'll SEEM like it's bigger. 

User avatar
Monderegal

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 406
Politics: Globalist
Location: Turtle Bay

Why? Ukraine is already winning. Putin didn't mention any escalation on Victory Day today. The US is reopening its embassy in Kiev. No cyber attacks to think of by Russia. Why bother? Its also not NATO. Between the Ukrainians and Russians is probably how the US security establishment is rallying around. That includes Biden.

User avatar
Taipan

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 6,001
Politics: Libertarian

Cannonpointer » 09 May 2022, 5:09 pm » wrote: Yeah yeah blah blah, sis boom bah, go biden go biden rah rah rah - sissy.

NATO's budget hasn't changed, fruit loop - but if you say something really tough, it'll SEEM like it's bigger.

The Communist loves the Socialist.
The Socialist loves the American Democrat.
Are you a closet Communist backing Vlad "The Mad" ?
Will you be voting with the Dem in Nov.?

Or will you be voting GOP with Mike Huckabee, Kayleigh McEnany, Laura Ingraham, Jesse Watters,
Dana Perino, Sean Hannity, Tucker, &........little old me ?                           
:clap:  

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 45,075

Antifa
Vegas » 08 May 2022, 1:09 pm » wrote: I say yes. Sooner than we think. The American government has always had a thirst for war. Not only war but occupation. If we go to war with Russia, I am certain that we won't just leave if we win. We will occupy Ukraine for years to come. This will happen sooner than later. The midterms are coming up and the dims know they are going to get slaughtered. So, what better way to deflect from their incompetence than by going to war? The left will love it. The government will make up some **** as to how our national safety is at risk unless we fight Russia and help Ukraine...or some other made-up **** that the left will swallow.
"Foots on the ground"?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VVH7Jd0dqo

User avatar
Taipan

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 6,001
Politics: Libertarian


Don't make me sell Alaska back to Russia !!                                   :rofl:   :rofl:  

User avatar
Vegas

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Giant Slayer
Posts: 15,845
Politics: Beer and Popcorn


More copy/paste. No rebuttal, as usual. The same redundant ****. 

See rule 2. Enough of your repetitiveness. 

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 45,075

Antifa
Vegas » 10 May 2022, 1:07 pm » wrote: More copy/paste. No rebuttal, as usual. The same redundant ****. 

See rule 2. Enough of your repetitiveness.
The plural of "foot" is "feet", the expression is "boots on the ground"..


Holy crap. are you **** stupid.

User avatar
Vegas

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Giant Slayer
Posts: 15,845
Politics: Beer and Popcorn

Blackvegetable » 10 May 2022, 1:09 pm » wrote: The plural of "foot" is "feet", the expression is "boots on the ground"..

Holy crap. are you **** stupid.

*******. I meant to write 'boots.' I didn't check it. I can always count on a lefty to refer to grammar and spelling when they have no argument. 

Predictable lefty playbook.

1. More spelling/grammar 
2. Still wont try and debunk it....cop out "there is nothing to debunk." Blah blah blah....
3. Project/questions/demand.

Predictable piece of ****. 

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 45,075

Antifa
Vegas » 10 May 2022, 1:13 pm » wrote: *******. I meant to write 'boots.' I didn't check it. I can always count on a lefty to refer to grammar and spelling when they have no argument. 

Predictable lefty playbook.

1. More spelling/grammar 
2. Still wont try and debunk it....cop out "there is nothing to debunk." Blah blah blah....
3. Project/questions/demand.

Predictable piece of ****.
Whatever contest YOU thought we were having?

It's settled.

User avatar
Vegas

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Giant Slayer
Posts: 15,845
Politics: Beer and Popcorn

Blackvegetable » 10 May 2022, 1:15 pm » wrote: Whatever contest YOU thought we were having?

It's settled.
 
  • **** question. Just as predicted. 
  • No rebuttal, just as predicted. 
  • 100% accuracy, as usual.
QED. 

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 45,075

Antifa
Vegas » 10 May 2022, 1:17 pm » wrote:
  • **** question. Just as predicted. 
  • No rebuttal, just as predicted. 
  • 100% accuracy, as usual.
QED.
Now it is time for you to try to prove that you aren't a moron...

User avatar
Vegas

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Giant Slayer
Posts: 15,845
Politics: Beer and Popcorn

Blackvegetable » 10 May 2022, 1:19 pm » wrote: Now it is time for you to try to prove that you aren't a moron...

Oh look. He has never said this before. 

Rule 2, idiot. STOP BEING SO **** PREDICTABLE!!!!

Even I am tired of my 100% accuracy. 

Watch:
1. Pic, or some other copy/pasted comment I made. 

**** pathetic. Just embarrassing. 

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Share      Unread post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 22,701
Politics: Insurrectionist
Location: Your sister's bedroom - the slutty one

WhistleSNAP
Taipan » 10 May 2022, 12:45 pm » wrote: The Communist loves the Socialist.
The Socialist loves the American Democrat.
And you are in lockstep with the American Democrat - making you a communist socialist - NOT a libertardian. 

User avatar
Taipan

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 6,001
Politics: Libertarian

Cannonpointer » 10 May 2022, 1:42 pm » wrote: And you are in lockstep with the American Democrat - making you a communist socialist - NOT a libertardian.

No sir.
To love Jesus, Goodness, Light, Justice, Freedom & Brotherly Love does not belong to
1 political party, one religion, 1 race, 1 country, or any 1 group of any kind.
It is ................"universal".
By the same token so is hate for Satan, Evilness, Darkness, Sin of all kind,
Communist Domination, Nazi Domination, or any other kind of domination.
It is Universal.

Hang around me, kid.
I will teach you how to think........like a White Man.                                    
:clap:  

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Share      Unread post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 22,701
Politics: Insurrectionist
Location: Your sister's bedroom - the slutty one

WhistleSNAP
Taipan » 10 May 2022, 4:33 pm » wrote: No sir.
To love Jesus, Goodness, Light, Justice, Freedom & Brotherly Love does not belong to
1 political party, one religion, 1 race, 1 country, or any 1 group of any kind.
It is ................"universal".

 
Okay, *** - DEFEND your demonrat buddies. Tranny culture has an excellent friend in you, funny boi.
 

User avatar
Taipan

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 6,001
Politics: Libertarian

Cannonpointer » 10 May 2022, 5:56 pm » wrote: Okay, *** - DEFEND your demonrat buddies. Tranny culture has an excellent friend in you, funny boi.

You are turning to homo insults again because you are losing the Ukraine-War debate.
Your feelings are hurt.     I understand.        You are lashing out w/ cheap, adolescent,
Jr. High, 
insults.     You are unable to compete on a college debate stage or in a court of law.
In a court room Ted Cruz, Trey Gowdy, or Laura Ingraham would mop the floor with you.
You didn't graduate from high school, did you?         (I didn't think so)

I should have been a psychologist.
I can read you like a cheap paper-back novel.
Have a nice evening.....................(loser)......................
:wave:  

 

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Share      Unread post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 22,701
Politics: Insurrectionist
Location: Your sister's bedroom - the slutty one

WhistleSNAP
Taipan » 10 May 2022, 6:53 pm » wrote: You are turning to homo insults again because you are losing the Ukraine-War debate.
There isn't any debate. You don't bring facts OR arguments. You bring hollow-ringing texas *** talk and retarded claims that a standard issue fox noise *** is a libertarian. . 
 
 A pro-war, pro-wall street libertarian - or phony ***, as it's called among men. :)

User avatar
SJConspirator

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,013
Politics: Green

Vegas » 08 May 2022, 1:09 pm » wrote: I say yes. Sooner than we think. The American government has always had a thirst for war. Not only war but occupation. If we go to war with Russia, I am certain that we won't just leave if we win. We will occupy Ukraine for years to come. This will happen sooner than later. The midterms are coming up and the dims know they are going to get slaughtered. So, what better way to deflect from their incompetence than by going to war? The left will love it. The government will make up some **** as to how our national safety is at risk unless we fight Russia and help Ukraine...or some other made-up **** that the left will swallow.
At the height of the Cold War (1965 to 1975) there was a massive arms buildup in the USSR and in the USA.  There was underground bunkers built to withstand nuclear blast and survive radioactive fallout.  There were missile silos built to deliver ICBMs.  There was Hollywood movies produced in the 1980s that were based on the theoretical nuclear war that would destroy all of us, like War Games and Hunt for Red October.

there was a concept called Mutually Assured Destruction, MAD.  The acronym works on two levels, because aggression = suicide, it would be madness.  This stopped the US from attacking Russia directly then, and vice versa, and it stops us now.  This is all well known history.  So no offense, but the question is a bit stupid.. the answer is an obvious no.
 
 
EDIT:  the whole premise of the movie Red Dawn was absolutely ridiculous, for the reasons I have stated.  I can’t believe that movie was ever made or shown to audiences
 
Last edited by SJConspirator on 10 May 2022, 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Vegas

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Giant Slayer
Posts: 15,845
Politics: Beer and Popcorn

SJConspirator » 10 May 2022, 8:52 pm » wrote: At the height of the Cold War (1965 to 1975) there was a massive arms buildup in the USSR and in the USA.  There was underground bunkers built to withstand nuclear blast and survive radioactive fallout.  There were missile silos built to deliver ICBMs.  There was Hollywood movies produced in the 1980s that were based on the theoretical nuclear war that would destroy all of us, like War Games and Hunt for Red October.

there was a concept called Mutually Assured Destruction, MAD.  The acronym works on two levels, because aggression = suicide, it would be madness.  This stopped the US from attacking Russia directly then, and it sets now.  This is all well known history.  So no offense, but the question is a bit stupid.. the answer is an obvious no.

Different context. Putin's motives are completely different than what the cold war was about. He appears to have an all or nothing point of view. I can see him being crazy enough to use nukes. The Soviet Union leadership wasn't that crazy. I think Putin is unpredictable. That makes him dangerous. If he uses nukes, then we will also, but not before we try to stop him through military operations.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Buffalo, Cannonpointer, ConsRule, Doug1943, Famagusta, FOS, freeman, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hank, Holdor, Ike Bana, Independent, Jantje_Smit, jeffey17, jefftec, Jinn Martini, Monderegal, nefarious101, NEILCAR, neue regel, PaperLi [Bot], Pastafarian, razoo, roadkill, ScottMon, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, Skans, sooted up Cyndi, Spartan, Squatchman, Staplophobia, thelion, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Warcok, Yandex [Bot], Zeets2 and 555 guests