You can't even answer the question with out being butt hurt. It is a hypothetical that eliminates trying to take over land in Russia or the US. It is mean to show power against power and the neutral land is unimportant but you are so flipping obtuse it's silly.Cannonpointer » 06 Jun 2023, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑
The loser would likely be whoever was the first to invade the neutrals, as the neutral (no LONGER neutral) would see the second army to invade as their rescuers, and would align with them, showing them all of the various terrain advantages their soil offers and assisting them in exploiting those.
The original invader would have supply issues right away - the rescuers, not so much.
I need more information about your retar ted hypo-hysterical. In this retarded scenario, who invades the neutrals first?
Also, eho has the smallest number of generals and top advisors in dresses? There is simply more to war than game pieces on a board, dummy.
No, you said that "I" think they are there to help. I am only saying what the US government thought it was trying to do. I don't think it works, so how can they be helping? The whole mission should have destroy the camps and kill the enemy and leave. You say that whack-a-mole doesn't work. I can only guess that you would have done nothing.
Are you genuinely dumb enough to believe we were there to help?
So, impossible to happen and utterly irrelevant to the adult world and unworthy of respectful comment?
"There to help" and actually "helping" are two different things, fruitcake.
Do you GENUINELY feel you need to explain the purpose of your sophomoric hypothetical, rube goldberg? Do you think explaining its obvious intention will render it more dignified and worthy of response?RayJJohnson » 06 Jun 2023, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑
I just heard the news 20 minutes ago.....been busy lately fencing and working on a new barn.
**** AmericaMajik » 06 Jun 2023, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑
my prayers go out to all those affected.
Ukrainian forces sabotaged the Kakhovka hydroelectric dam in Russia’s Kherson Region in a bid to deprive Crimea of drinking water and distract from Kiev’s faltering counteroffensive, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov claimed on Tuesday.The dam was partially destroyed early on Tuesday morning, sending torrents of water downstream and flooding towns and villages along the path of the Dnieper River. “We are talking about a deliberate sabotage by the Ukrainian side,” Peskov told reporters. “This sabotage could potentially lead to very serious consequences for several tens of thousands of inhabitants of the region, environmental consequences and consequences of a different nature, which have yet to be established.”Peskov claimed that one of the key goals of the attack was to deprive Crimea of water. Crimea’s 2 million residents largely receive their water from the North Crimean Canal, which is fed from the reservoir above the Kakhovka dam.
VIDEO shows Russian forces repelling Ukrainian offensive“This sabotage is also connected with the fact that, having launched large-scale offensive operations two days ago, the Ukrainian armed forces are not achieving their goals,” Peskov continued. Russia’s Defense Ministry has said it repelled several large-scale attacks in the southern sector of the front in recent days. These “offensive actions are choking,” Peskov stated.Ukrainian officials and their European backers have accused Russia of blowing up the dam, with European Council President Charles Michel calling the attack “a war crime.” Moscow “strongly rejects” the accusation, Peskov said.While the flooding now makes it difficult for Ukrainian forces to cross the Dnieper and attack Russia’s defensive lines, the destruction of the dam also appears to aid a number of Ukraine’s key objectives. The flooding mostly threatens the eastern bank of the river, where Russian troops withdrew to last year amid concerns that the Ukrainian military would blow up the dam. With the dam destroyed, the level of the Dnieper has fallen further upstream, including at the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant. Ukrainian troops made several attempts to cross the river to recapture the plant from Russian forces last year, and lowering the water level would remove a major obstacle to future attempts. Additionally, the Soviet-era plant depends on water from the Dnieper to cool its reactors and its spent fuel rods. The Ukrainian military conducted a test strike on the dam using an American-supplied HIMARS launcher last year, Ukrainian General Andrey Kovalchuk told the Washington Post in December. Two months earlier, Russia’s envoy to the United Nations, Vassily Nebenzia, warned the UN Security Council that Kiev’s forces were considering a “reckless” attack on the dam with sea mines or missiles. “The authorities in Kiev and their Western backers will bear full responsibility for all the consequences of such a devastating scenario,” Nebenzia cautioned.
https://www.rt.com/russia/577573-ukrain ... erson-dam/
No, **** the evil that has lead America down this path......and I know my friend the list is long but I also know that American's are not inherently Evil .... they are under a **** spell put upon them since 1988...
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, berniebro, Bill Gates [Bot], Bruce, Buck Naked, Buffalo, Chiseler151, ConsRule, FJB, GHETTO BLASTER, golfboy, Goodgrief, Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, IamWoman, impartialobserver, Jantje_Smit, jefftec, jerra b, Justin Sane, Kobia2, LowIQTrash, MackTheFinger, Majik, Mrkelly, murdock, Neo, neue regel, OdeToJoy, Pasta’sVengeance, PhiloBeddo, Punch, RebelGator, ROG62, Semrush [Bot], Skans, sooted up Cyndi, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], Str8tEdge, Sumela, Tempest62, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Yandex [Bot], Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest