What a prick of a judge, and a bank. This is how bad the fusion of government and capitalism has become in America.A Pennsylvania judge has ruled against a widow whose home was sold at a tax auction in 2011 after she failed to pay $6.30 in unpaid interest.
Eileen Battisti’s home was sold in September 2011 over the unpaid interest, despite Battisti’s claims that she paid everything that she thought she had to pay.
“I paid everything, and didn’t know about the $6.30,” said Battisti. “For the house to be sold just because of $6.30 is crazy.”Beaver County Judge Gus Kwidis handed down his ruling last week, maintaining his belief that Battisti had been given ample notice to pay the money, which in full was $235 including other fees and accrued interest.
That sounds like petty government bureaucracy, not capitalism. She needs to sue someone.KiwiPete » 02 May 2014 11:04 pm » wrote:Here is capitalism for you: http://banoosh.com/blog/2014/05/02/this ... over-6-30/
What a prick of a judge, and a bank. This is how bad the fusion of government and capitalism has become in America.![]()
Social well being and compassion for those in bad straights is viewed as far less important than giving banks money, or foreclosing on people and destroying their lives.
But given half the chance, many legislators would have America turned into a fascist state, where corporations can do whatever they like and crush all competition. Fascism of the Mussolini definition, already exists in areas like Agriculture, with the FDA basically eating out of Monsanto's hand while crushing small farmers.
Read Naomi Wolf, and you might learn what fascism means, or read Mussolini, this quote is as succinct as it gets:tharock220 » 02 May 2014 11:06 pm » wrote:You're a **** idiot!!!
It is capitalism, as tax debts are put above human welfare by the government, and the financial community.Cannonpointer » 02 May 2014 11:10 pm » wrote:
That sounds like petty government bureaucracy, not capitalism. She needs to sue someone.
OMGOSH!!!! Cannonpointer FINALLY realizing that government regulation is used to consolidate corporate power???????Cannonpointer » 02 May 2014 10:35 pm » wrote:Instead of definitions, let's talk functions.
Look at the materials required to construct a solar panel.They cost about $200.00. Add a day's labor to that $200.00, and you've got yourself a solar panel. You could sell iffor $400.00, and you've got yourself a job. So, why isn't anyone doing it?We live in a free enterprise economy, do we not?
Not.
We live in a capitalist economy, which games the system to PREVENT free enterprise. You are not allowed to sell your solar panels without a stamp of approval from Underwriters Laboratories -and they are gate keepers for Wall Street.The cost of shaking hands with UL prevents free enterprisers from operating in that market -and the same thing is going on in almost every market. The little guy is locked out by the engineered and manipulated expense of sitting at the table - locked out. Only Wall Streeters, using OTHER PEOPLES' capital, can afford to play in the game.
We need to go back to a free enterprise economy, where the little guy does not face unsurmountable obstacles to starting a small business.
Yes but to be clear, the "government regulation" does not originate with the government but from the corporate world. In other words, the government is a tool of the American capitalist system to get what it wants.Str8tEdge » 03 May 2014 7:20 am » wrote: OMGOSH!!!! Cannonpointer FINALLY realizing that government regulation is used to consolidate corporate power???????
Prepare for the 2nd coming!!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Buy the solar panel made here and it lasts decades. Buy it from China and you're lucky it works at all!Cannonpointer » 02 May 2014 10:35 pm » wrote:Instead of definitions, let's talk functions.
Look at the materials required to construct a solar panel.They cost about $200.00. Add a day's labor to that $200.00, and you've got yourself a solar panel. You could sell iffor $400.00, and you've got yourself a job. So, why isn't anyone doing it?We live in a free enterprise economy, do we not?
Not.
We live in a capitalist economy, which games the system to PREVENT free enterprise. You are not allowed to sell your solar panels without a stamp of approval from Underwriters Laboratories -and they are gate keepers for Wall Street.The cost of shaking hands with UL prevents free enterprisers from operating in that market -and the same thing is going on in almost every market. The little guy is locked out by the engineered and manipulated expense of sitting at the table - locked out. Only Wall Streeters, using OTHER PEOPLES' capital, can afford to play in the game.
We need to go back to a free enterprise economy, where the little guy does not face unsurmountable obstacles to starting a small business.
This is the fascism I have been ranting about for years now!Nubber » 03 May 2014 9:52 am » wrote:
Yes but to be clear, the "government regulation" does not originate with the government but from the corporate world. In other words, the government is a tool of the American capitalist system to get what it wants.
Can't do it CP. Let me put it to you the way the National Electrical Code put's it to me as an electrical contractor. Every electrical device manufactured in the US, as well as most countries requires them to be "Listed". The definition of listed in the NEC reads as follows:Cannonpointer » 02 May 2014 10:35 pm » wrote:Instead of definitions, let's talk functions.
Look at the materials required to construct a solar panel.They cost about $200.00. Add a day's labor to that $200.00, and you've got yourself a solar panel. You could sell iffor $400.00, and you've got yourself a job. So, why isn't anyone doing it?We live in a free enterprise economy, do we not?
Not.
We live in a capitalist economy, which games the system to PREVENT free enterprise. You are not allowed to sell your solar panels without a stamp of approval from Underwriters Laboratories -and they are gate keepers for Wall Street.The cost of shaking hands with UL prevents free enterprisers from operating in that market -and the same thing is going on in almost every market. The little guy is locked out by the engineered and manipulated expense of sitting at the table - locked out. Only Wall Streeters, using OTHER PEOPLES' capital, can afford to play in the game.
We need to go back to a free enterprise economy, where the little guy does not face unsurmountable obstacles to starting a small business.
So when did the tide turn? When did elected officials decide to side with corporations in favor of laborers and consumers? I say Reagan changed all that.Nubber » 03 May 2014 9:52 am » wrote: Yes but to be clear, the "government regulation" does not originate with the government but from the corporate world. In other words, the government is a tool of the American capitalist system to get what it wants.
and the rich have been getting unimaginably richer ever since.greatnpowerfuloz » 03 May 2014 5:43 pm » wrote:
So when did the tide turn? When did elected officials decide to side with corporations in favor of laborers and consumers? I say Reagan changed all that.
Can't somebody just make the panels themselves? Don't people do that all the time? Does UL have a requirement to be involved? It becomes and issue when you try to sell stuff to others.Cannonpointer » 02 May 2014 10:35 pm » wrote:Instead of definitions, let's talk functions.
Look at the materials required to construct a solar panel.They cost about $200.00. Add a day's labor to that $200.00, and you've got yourself a solar panel. You could sell iffor $400.00, and you've got yourself a job. So, why isn't anyone doing it?We live in a free enterprise economy, do we not?
Not.
We live in a capitalist economy, which games the system to PREVENT free enterprise. You are not allowed to sell your solar panels without a stamp of approval from Underwriters Laboratories -and they are gate keepers for Wall Street.The cost of shaking hands with UL prevents free enterprisers from operating in that market -and the same thing is going on in almost every market. The little guy is locked out by the engineered and manipulated expense of sitting at the table - locked out. Only Wall Streeters, using OTHER PEOPLES' capital, can afford to play in the game.
We need to go back to a free enterprise economy, where the little guy does not face unsurmountable obstacles to starting a small business.
Elected officials decided to side with corporations when corporations started buying elections. Before the 17th amendment, it was impossible for special interest money to invest in Senate campaigns.greatnpowerfuloz » 03 May 2014 5:43 pm » wrote: So when did the tide turn? When did elected officials decide to side with corporations in favor of laborers and consumers? I say Reagan changed all that.
WTF are you talking about? i got solar dealers from all over the country banging down my door constantly wanting me to become a dealer. IT'S BS! there's no commercial market and it's not worth it for a residential property owner..............Cannonpointer » 02 May 2014 10:35 pm » wrote:Instead of definitions, let's talk functions.
Look at the materials required to construct a solar panel.They cost about $200.00. Add a day's labor to that $200.00, and you've got yourself a solar panel. You could sell iffor $400.00, and you've got yourself a job. So, why isn't anyone doing it?We live in a free enterprise economy, do we not?
Not.
We live in a capitalist economy, which games the system to PREVENT free enterprise. You are not allowed to sell your solar panels without a stamp of approval from Underwriters Laboratories -and they are gate keepers for Wall Street.The cost of shaking hands with UL prevents free enterprisers from operating in that market -and the same thing is going on in almost every market. The little guy is locked out by the engineered and manipulated expense of sitting at the table - locked out. Only Wall Streeters, using OTHER PEOPLES' capital, can afford to play in the game.
We need to go back to a free enterprise economy, where the little guy does not face unsurmountable obstacles to starting a small business.
KiwiPete » 02 May 2014 11:04 pm » wrote:Here is capitalism for you: http://banoosh.com/blog/2014/05/02/this ... over-6-30/ What a prick of a judge, and a bank. This is how bad the fusion of government and capitalism has become in America.![]()
Social well being and compassion for those in bad straights is viewed as far less important than giving banks money, or foreclosing on people and destroying their lives.
But given half the chance, many legislators would have America turned into a fascist state, where corporations can do whatever they like and crush all competition. Fascism of the Mussolini definition, already exists in areas like Agriculture, with the FDA basically eating out of Monsanto's hand while crushing small farmers.
Lostphoenix » 03 May 2014 6:10 pm » wrote: and the rich have been getting unimaginably richer ever since.
to the detriment of everyone else
Nubber » 03 May 2014 9:52 am » wrote: Yes but to be clear, the "government regulation" does not originate with the government but from the corporate world. In other words, the government is a tool of the American capitalist system to get what it wants.
Users browsing this forum: Annoyed Liberall, Beekeeper, Buck Naked, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Chiseler151, ConsRule, DeplorablePatriot, FJB, FOS, golfboy, Goodgrief, Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hank, Ike Bana, Jantje_Smit, jefftec, jerra b, johndnorth, Kobia2, Majik, Makallbuks, Mirabeau, Monderegal, Mr. 7, Mrkelly, NEILCAR, neue regel, Nostradamus' omh, OdeToJoy, PaperLi [Bot], Pastafarian, Pastor Blast, PhiloBeddo, RebelGator, roadkill, ROG62, ScottMon, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, Skans, sooted up Cyndi, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], sunburn, Taipan, Tempest62, Trumprules, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Warcok, WindyCocoa, Xavier_Onassis, Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest