After catching Glory Hole in another lie, I went to another thread wherein I had challenged Glory Hole to post proof of a false assertion he made about me. Here was his response:Cannonpointer » 23 Jul 2014 5:44 pm » wrote: Hmmm... Interesting. So you never called the GM bailout socialist, huh? I went over yonder, Clemmie, and what did I find?
Gosh. His final answer looks like just another Glory Hole whopper.![]()
Isn't it going to be ironic, when Glory Hole personifies the projection he made against me. ^^RichClem » 23 Jul 2014 3:15 pm » wrote: Oh yeah, that's exactly what I need to do; chase your original quote so that you can lie and evade and write more bulls***.
Hmm, then why did the right do that?Str8tEdge » 23 Jul 2014 5:57 pm » wrote: We fill out treatment plans freestyle, dispatcher. We enter admission data into a computer....
It must suck to be such a loser as to ridicule one of the most respected and honorable professions out there, nursing.![]()
![]()
Do WHAT, drunk?shintao » 23 Jul 2014 6:02 pm » wrote: Hmm, then why did the right do that?
Why do you morons denigrate government service? Teaching? The legal profession? That's to name a few.Str8tEdge » 23 Jul 2014 6:09 pm » wrote:
Do WHAT, drunk?
You **** RETARDS haven't provided ANY evidence you have actual gainful employment or any education to speak of. Do THAT FIRST, and THEN I'll be perfectly happy to make fun of you LOSERS.Cannonpointer » 23 Jul 2014 6:16 pm » wrote: Why do you morons denigrate government service? Teaching? The legal profession? That's to name a few.
You have run around denigrating the alleged profession of just about every liberal on the board - straw-manning them into jobs of your choosing and then mocking their jobs, But you whine and cry and try to hide your shame and lies behind the honorable profession of REAL nursing (not bed-pan nursing on a trade school certificate) when I give you a taste of your own medicine.
It's a little late for that, Devry. You've been denigrating the professions of liberals for longer than this site has been up.Str8tEdge » 23 Jul 2014 6:20 pm » wrote:
You **** RETARDS haven't provided ANY evidence you have actual gainful employment or any education to speak of. Do THAT FIRST, and THEN I'll be perfectly happy to make fun of you LOSERS.
AH, so according to you I'm "denigrating" the professions of liberals on the site even though none of them have been "foolish" enough to "out" their professions......Cannonpointer » 23 Jul 2014 6:28 pm » wrote: It's a little late for that, Devry. You've been denigrating the professions of liberals for longer than this site has been up.
And no, we won't be following your foolish example, Devry. We would risk whining about being "outed," as you did following the sleuthing that proved you were the proud recipient of a mostly online Devry certificate.
Yes. You have persistently denigrated other pisters' professions - usually straw-manning those professions Of course, you already know this. You are the one who does it, fight club. You've done it to me in this very thread.Str8tEdge » 23 Jul 2014 6:43 pm » wrote:
AH, so according to you I'm "denigrating" the professions of liberals on the site even though none of them have been "foolish" enough to "out" their professions......
The minister of finance cannot make changes to the company on a whim. There's a protocol to follow just like any other company. I've already agreed that it's socialism, but your attempt to compare it to the Federal Government taking over GM is beyond stupid. It basically stops with government holding a stake in a corporation.Cannonpointer » 23 Jul 2014 10:20 am » wrote:
You said "shareholders," which of course you know to be a lie. There is only one "shareholder:" the government of Singapore. Government ownership of the means of production WAS socialism, before you came out, son.
And you don't get to say what I want - unless you agree that I get to say what you want (which will be anonymous bathroom ****, of course).
What have we learned? We have learned that your definition of socialism is a crowd-sourced, partisan, go-along-get-along definition. A conjob definition. A definition handed to you at the memory hole, where you made a burnt offering of your PREVIOUS definition of that word to your one true god - repuke ideology.
What must it be like, I wonder, to come on this board and feel a need to pretend that government ownership of the means of production is not socialism, so long as it is formatted in a manner pleasing to Heritage (whose pleasure would be to call Singapore socialist, but for its economic success)?
What IS that like, for you? It's not as if we do not BOTH know that Obama investing in GM equaled socialism, NOTWITHSTANDING NO DAY TO DAY OVERSIGHT - SIMPLY SHAREHOLDER STATUS (and not even the only shareholder). We BOTH know that you call it socialism when it suits youHeritage, and capitalism when it suits you Heritage. That's zero integrity, bub. That's a wiggling, niggling little fellow, is what that is.
You found out again what an imbecile you are.Cannonpointer » 23 Jul 2014 5:44 pm » wrote: Hmmm... Interesting. So you never called the GM bailout socialist, huh? I went over yonder, Clemmie, and what did I find?
.Cannonpointer » 23 Jul 2014 5:49 pm » wrote:And Singapore is all freedomsih and freedomesque, because HERITAGE SAYS SO, right?
But back to Singapore:
They maintain their sprawling, government owned and operated public health complex through a mix of
"compulsory savings, subsidies and price controls." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Singapore
PRICE CONTROLS! SUBSIDIES! GOVERNMENT OWNED AND OPERATED HEALTH CARE! Yeah - if WE did that, you would be singing a far different tune.
Whatever Heritage tell you, you will spew. Singapore is far more socialist, by the definitions you have used over and over and over again, than we are. But Heritage said they were more "free," and that means they CAN'T be socialist - even when they are socialist.
OBAMA, though - now HE is a socialist. The very dictionary definition, according to your previous posts.
Try to **** the nurses out of their union pedophile druggie.Str8tEdge » 23 Jul 2014 6:09 pm » wrote: Do WHAT, drunk?
Yes, I'm bragging. I finished with a 3.94 GPA for my BSN, class valedictorian. I'm a registered nurse in two states. I ran a business for 9 years and spent 15 years in management before I got my degree.Cannonpointer » 23 Jul 2014 6:54 pm » wrote: Yes. You have persistently denigrated other pisters' professions - usually straw-manning those professions Of course, you already know this. You are the one who does it, fight club. You've done it to me in this very thread.
And, no. We aren't so foolish as you, Devry - you who divulged so much that in the end he accused his audience of "outing" him, when they took his offerings and discovered the online trade school reality behind his bragging.
OK, lets see your evidence druggie.Str8tEdge » 23 Jul 2014 6:20 pm » wrote: You **** RETARDS haven't provided ANY evidence you have actual gainful employment or any education to speak of. Do THAT FIRST, and THEN I'll be perfectly happy to make fun of you LOSERS.![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm a BSN RN and licensed in two states. That IS real nursing, *******.
Not in a union and out of all the hospitals in this area, only one I know of has unionized RN's and that's SLU hospital.shintao » 23 Jul 2014 9:00 pm » wrote: Try to **** the nurses out of their union pedophile druggie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_9SE0F7uP4
Allow me to grant your every argument - and no, because it is not relevant.tharock220 » 23 Jul 2014 7:26 pm » wrote:
The minister of finance cannot make changes to the company on a whim. There's a protocol to follow just like any other company. I've already agreed that it's socialism, but your attempt to compare it to the Federal Government taking over GM is beyond stupid. It basically stops with government holding a stake in a corporation.
Are you ever going to explain your 30% calculation???
I pay Medicare, but don't use it.Cannonpointer » 18 Jul 2014 4:55 am » wrote:The majority of nations which made Heritage's list have socialized health care, socialized retirement and socialized higher education - the stuff that heritage and the contards who worship there call socialism.
Silence. I want you to shut the **** up. Stop sniveling on my shoulder. I want you to man up - to walk it off.rayj » 23 Jul 2014 10:08 pm » wrote:
I pay Medicare, but don't use it.
I pay SS, but don't use it.
Most of my RE taxes go to education. I haven't had a kid in school for over 20 years.
I am already living a socialist life! What the **** else do you want from me?
Users browsing this forum: Annoyed Liberall, Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Buck Naked, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Chiseler151, ConsRule, DeplorablePatriot, FJB, FOS, golfboy, Goodgrief, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hank, Ike Bana, Jantje_Smit, jefftec, jerra b, johndnorth, Kobia2, Majik, Makallbuks, Mirabeau, Monderegal, Mr. 7, Mrkelly, NEILCAR, neue regel, Nostradamus' omh, OdeToJoy, PaperLi [Bot], Pastafarian, Pastor Blast, PhiloBeddo, RebelGator, roadkill, ROG62, ScottMon, SJConspirator, Skans, sooted up Cyndi, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], sunburn, Tempest62, Trumprules, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Warcok, WindyCocoa, Xavier_Onassis, Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest