Hat_Creek » 24 Dec 2013 3:54 pm wrote:
Should liberalism include person responsibility, they wouldn't overwhelmingly push for govenment to enforce
what should be issues ruled by personal responsibility. What you support is forced responsibility, or to word it
more fittingly, forced response.
Oh, this is a riot. In one breath, you argue against personal responsiblity by saying that gays are more likely to rape children, and then you lecture me about how liberallism isn't for personal responsiblity.
I'm all for throwing the book at child rapers, regardless of their sexual preference.