Better Braze Your Lips To The Gunwales Of The Bathysphere SS Grifty, Fluffers....She's Goin' Down!...

[Blackvegetable]

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-21/us-can-use-seized-classified-documents-in-probe-court-says?srnd=premium&sref=lMtIv2Vb“

We cannot discern why plaintiff would have an individual interest in or need for any of the one-hundred documents with classification markings,” a three-judge panel of the appeals court panel said in its ruling. The panel comprised of Judge Robin S. Rosenbaum, an appointee of President Barack Obama, Judge Britt Grant and Judge Andrew Brasher, both Trump appointees, was unanimous in the decision.The judges rejected suggestions that Trump had declassified the documents.

 “The declassification argument is a red herring because declassifying an official document would not change its content or render it personal,” the panel said. “So even if we assumed that plaintiff did declassify some or all of the documents, that would not explain why he has a personal interest in them.”
 
 

[Blackvegetable]

Can I get a
* chuckle *
from the Congregation?


Oh, I KNEW I could!

[Blackvegetable]

 “The declassification argument is a red herring because declassifying an official document would not change its content or render it personal,” the panel said. “So even if we assumed that plaintiff did declassify some or all of the documents, that would not explain why he has a personal interest in them.”

so they going to charge him with "interest" in a document?

No...they dismiss HIS assertion of such interest. Thus invalidating his arguments not to exempt the classified documents from review, and his right to be in possession.
 

[Blackvegetable]

going down like your momma and a negro penis.

Apparently like you on a grifter penis..
 

[Blackvegetable]

Any updates on the Grifter Presidential Library?



 

[nuckin futz]

Can I get a
* chuckle *
from the Congregation?

Oh, I KNEW I could!

Do I have to braze my lips? Sounds very painfull!      
 

[Ike Bana]

so they going to charge him with "interest" in a document?

 

They are going to charge Trump with violations of the Espionage Act.
 

[Ike Bana]

As they say LOL. 
If they do, I suggest you hide in your mothers basement.

As they say...LOL.  Really?  Hide from whom?  From you?  
 

[Blackvegetable]

Seems like a double standard. Hillary had all those classified documents. Nothing came of it.

To whom does it "seem" that way, Ray?


 

[Blackvegetable]

As they say LOL. 
If they do, I suggest you hide in your mothers basement.

Why?

What the **** are you gonna do?

Leave your mother's basement in a rage like so many of your fellowfluffers?
 

[Blackvegetable]

1917 Espionage Act

so loosely written and ill defined. Another nothing burger for @Ike Bana  and his wet dreams.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/donald-trum ... ionage-act

Did your job involve much reading or writing, Stoker?

[Blackvegetable]

like your momma and a negro penis.

Ray,

You're an idiot with a small vocabulary and limited imagination.

I suggest you think hard about putting those you love in the line of my fire.
 

[Independent]

No...they dismiss HIS assertion of such interest. Thus invalidating his arguments not to exempt the classified documents from review, and his right to be in possession.

You got him this time, I can feel it. 

[Ike Bana]

You got him this time, I can feel it.

Amazing since every indication here is that you are paralyzed from the neck up.
 

[Blackvegetable]

You got him this time, I can feel it.

If you have no idea what's going on, what choice do you have but to go with your feels?
 

[Huey]

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-21/us-can-use-seized-classified-documents-in-probe-court-says?srnd=premium&sref=lMtIv2Vb“

We cannot discern why plaintiff would have an individual interest in or need for any of the one-hundred documents with classification markings,” a three-judge panel of the appeals court panel said in its ruling. The panel comprised of Judge Robin S. Rosenbaum, an appointee of President Barack Obama, Judge Britt Grant and Judge Andrew Brasher, both Trump appointees, was unanimous in the decision.The judges rejected suggestions that Trump had declassified the documents.


 

Edited for character count
Let's get the indictment and trial started. 

The judge's panned ruling in Trump's horde of documents case forbids the Justice Department from continuing to use the documents in its "investigation". Most observers think the special master ruling will delay the entire process for months, as would an appeal. So indict the bastard now. It's not as if we need additional evidence. Trump can thank Judge Cannon for it as he's escorted to the court house.

On the other hand, if the Justice Department wants to observe the sixty day hiatus normally observed before an election  perhaps wait to arrest him until after the election. But do it then. If they don't indict now or  then, but let themselves be put through this needless wringer,  it suggests they may not do it at all.

If they have the evidence they need to do it now.

Just to avoid any BS "2 Stands" diversions.  
 

[Blackvegetable]

Edited for character count
Let's get the indictment and trial started. 

Just to avoid any BS "2 Stands" diversions.

DMA in the hizzie!

It's not 2Stands, it's just very wide.
 

[Huey]

Edited for character count
Let's get the indictment and trial started. 

Just to avoid any BS "2 Stands" diversions.

DMA in the hizzie!

It's not 2Stands, it's just very wide.
 

 

Seems very clear and to the point.  And consistent.  Perhaps you could explain EXACLTY what confounds you. 

[Blackvegetable]

Seems very clear and to the point.  And consistent.  Perhaps you could explain EXACLTY what confounds you.

Yes.

Two diametrically opposed positions cannot constitute one stand.

But you insist, and proceed on the assumption that they do.


Acknowledge that this has been explained to you again, or this is the last stop.


 

[Huey]

Seems very clear and to the point.  And consistent.  Perhaps you could explain EXACLTY what confounds you.

Yes.

Two diametrically opposed positions cannot constitute one stand.

But you insist, and proceed on the assumption that they do.


Acknowledge that this has been explained to you again, or this is the last stop.


 

 

Well, since you can't give a narrative on what specific issue you have with what I posted on this thread I will bow out of this portion of the discussion.  If you have anything to say about your OP let me know.