Here's your Obama Economy, moonbats

Started by RichClem

This political chat room is for you to sound off about any political ideology and discuss current political topics. Everyone is welcome, yes, even conservatives, but keep in mind, the nature of the No Holds Barred political chat forum platform can be friendly to trolling. It is your responsibility to address this wisely. Forum Rules

56 replies to this topic Sticky this thread

User avatar
Posted by Misty
  26,476 16 Dec 2013, 4:55 pm

Misty Nevertheless, she persisted.
User avatar
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator

Posts: 24,979
Independent Independent political affiliation
Politics: N/A
Money: 26,476.36



Log in or register to remove this ad..
TheAmerican » 29 Nov 2013 9:40 am wrote:
Lostphoenix wrote:
RichClem » 29 Nov 2013 9:18 am wrote:
Here's your Obama Economy, moonbats.
you wouldn't be happy if you were fucked to death with a gold prick!

...well, I guess you don't have have much more to say on the OP??

Do you really think that when a title and an OP start out by calling people moonbats, it deserves a serious response?
It's a troll thread and it got the response it deserved.
0
Log in or register to remove this ad..

User avatar
Posted by Misty
  26,476 16 Dec 2013, 4:59 pm

Misty Nevertheless, she persisted.
User avatar
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator

Posts: 24,979
Independent Independent political affiliation
Politics: N/A
Money: 26,476.36



Endoscopy » 29 Nov 2013 4:39 pm wrote:
Lostphoenix wrote:
you wouldn't be happy if you were fucked to death with a gold prick!

What a pointed refutation of the point. Such great rhetoric in showing the problems with the statements of OP.

Ad hominem attacks are great debating techniques.


Both the thread title and the OP contain an ad hominem attack, but I don't see you calling out Clem for that.
As a matter of fact his posts are laced with ad hominem attacks, like 'moonbat' and 'troll'.
Have you ever taken him to task for that?
0

User avatar
Posted by Misty
  26,476 16 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm

Misty Nevertheless, she persisted.
User avatar
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator

Posts: 24,979
Independent Independent political affiliation
Politics: N/A
Money: 26,476.36



RichClem » 05 Dec 2013 2:41 pm wrote:
Amazing how liberals flee reality, in favor of their false liberal "reality."

They don't flee reality Kitten, they flee you.
There's no purpose in reading your posts anymore, as they all contain the same couple of words repeated ad nauseam.
0

User avatar
Posted by Misty
  26,476 16 Dec 2013, 5:16 pm

Misty Nevertheless, she persisted.
User avatar
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator

Posts: 24,979
Independent Independent political affiliation
Politics: N/A
Money: 26,476.36



RichClem » 01 Dec 2013 10:40 am wrote:
Lostphoenix wrote:
you cant debate clem...its like debating a 6 year old.

Funny how stupid people bleat the same stupid falsehood, but never try.

You're such a hypocrite.
You have no desire to debate anyone.
If you did, you would stop calling people who disagree with you childish names, and stop posting with all the italics, underlining, bold print, and large screaming red font.

Your posts look like the rantings of a fucking maniac.

RichClem » 10 Dec 2013 7:44 pm wrote:

Oh, sure, you're shocked and horrified that when a 30-something woman tried to have an affair with Fund, he went along.

Save your bulls*** for the moonbats, psycho, especially given your long, long, LONG history of defending felons and rapists.

You tried to smear him as a child molester. You're a truly disgusting person for trying that.

F*** off. Your immediate instinct is to lie and smear, regardless of facts.

Only a psychopath would smear someone as a child molester without knowing the evidence.
Just as only a psychopath would tell years of lies in defense of a serial rapist/ serial felon without knowing the evidence.

You still imply he's a pervert, refusing to note that the affair was many years later and that the "daughter" was in her early 30's by that time.
So obviously, you still lack the most basic sense of decency.

You're a literal psychopath.

Nor did you say it was "wrong." Had that been all you'd done, I wouldn't care in the slightest. Instead, your smeared him as a child molester, and f*** your usual "gosh-I-was-only-asking" bulls***.
0



Return to No Holds Barred Political Forum

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest

Who has visited this topic