RichClem » 01 Dec 2013 10:40 am wrote: Lostphoenix wrote:
you cant debate clem...its like debating a 6 year old.
Funny how stupid people bleat the same stupid falsehood, but never try.
You're such a hypocrite.
You have no desire to debate anyone.
If you did, you would stop calling people who disagree with you childish names, and stop posting with all the italics, underlining, bold print, and large screaming red font.
Your posts look like the rantings of a fucking maniac.
RichClem » 10 Dec 2013 7:44 pm wrote:
Oh, sure, you're shocked and horrified that when a 30-something woman tried to have an affair with Fund, he went along.
Save your bulls*** for the moonbats, psycho, especially given your long, long, LONG history of defending felons and rapists.
You tried to smear him as a child molester. You're a truly disgusting person for trying that.
F*** off. Your immediate instinct is to lie and smear, regardless of facts.
Only a psychopath would smear someone as a child molester without knowing the evidence.
Just as only a psychopath would tell years of lies in defense of a serial rapist/ serial felon without knowing the evidence.
You still imply he's a pervert, refusing to note that the affair was many years later and that the "daughter" was in her early 30's by that time.
So obviously, you still lack the most basic sense of decency.
You're a literal psychopath.
Nor did you say it was "wrong." Had that been all you'd done, I wouldn't care in the slightest. Instead, your smeared him as a child molester, and f*** your usual "gosh-I-was-only-asking" bulls***.